Friday, December 26, 2008

CAA II: Total Bul...


The trouble today is most people refuse to sweat things out. Any...






The same hedge-fund creamers who falsely drilled Texas Rep. Joe...






Millions of dollars in NPO shark salaries and not a page of Thim...






The late Dr. Bernard Rimland called it the "Pretending to Comba...






Any ASD research money goes directly into their pockets. You ca...






As moms and dads expose these crooks they simply move on to new...

Thursday, December 18, 2008

BOHICA All Over Again!

Gee, before you become engaged in lobbying activities don't you think it's a good idea of asking what this is all about? Or are you so self-interested and self-promoting that you really believe everything you participate in totally rocks?

Lately, it sounds like a few self-appointed Autism lobbyists aren't exactly fired up about their prospective bed-fellows. CLICK

Of course, as with the bogus Combating Autistics Act passage, by the time it becomes visible it's already too late. You can't flatten the tire on a steam-roller, can you? It hasn't got any.

The queer part of the article is the author (from Illinois) knew about this bill BEFORE the election ever took place and said nothing until now. A sure sign of someone least likely to have anything other than personal interests at heart. It's also a given that the purpose of writing the article was to exhibit some sort of twisted Marxist dialectic power attempting to belittle any parent wise enough to not go a-whoring with them.

Maybe if your kid is really recovered from ASD you should just buzz off or at least mind your own business now?

Bottom line: Any parent of an autistic kid already knows you can't legislate treatment decisions. Those decisions don't require an Act of Congress. Any parent of an autistic kid also knows what works for one child doesn't necessarily work for another.

Well, come to think about it...Well, gee....the likelihood of that is....

One strong suggestion is these self-promoters might try donning a paper bag?

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Americans Aren't Suckers

There is a common thread between the pediatrician and the serial killer. Both have the ability to disassociate themselves with their victims and they can pretend to not know what they've done when the truth confronts them.

Pediatricians all know what to do when vaccines they inject kill and damage. They also know what they are supposed to do by law, but don't.

Doesn't matter how many American infants and toddlers are killed by vaccination. Doesn't matter how many American children are robbed of their mental capacity by vaccination. As long as the pediatrician keeps their mouth shut they'll never get caught.

Pediatricians must have a thing about mirrors. That's obvious since they seem to be the only ones unable to see the eternal Lady Macbeth kind of guilt written on their foreheads.

Yet, it's not like a dark cloud blew in over America and syringes of Thimerosal-containing vaccines started raining down on infants and toddlers. While it's typical that the vaccines came like rain and the Autism sprouted up sometime after, it's merely foolish to suggest pre-epidemic efforts to create liability preemption weren't premeditated for no apparent reason other than soreness or redness.

Other parts of the world were removing Thimerosal from vaccines not long before the proliferation of vaccines in America began. They knew what to expect when the vaccine industrial complex morphed into the killer disease cabalism which universally stokes public perception that we're all gonna die if we don't buy and inject some kind of biological crap.

That's why vaccine lots are busted up. That's why they created Thimerosal-containing placebos. That's why Thimerosal is still in many infant and toddler shots. That's why the vaccine industrial complex is telling America the mercury is out when it really isn't.

The bitter hatred and prejudice toward parents of vaccine-injured children has nothing to do with unfortunate, innocent circumstances. It's more like apprehension drug dealers get every time they hear a nightly news mention something like "the Taliban have crept back into Afghanistan".

"Don't mess with their jack", they say. "You have to lie and say you're pro-vaccine or they won't even listen to you."

Lying publicly to win a seat at a table is not only foolishly wrong, but it has not helped any vaccine-injured child one bit. It never will. In fact, accommodating the vaccine industrial complex with lies has hurt countless other children which is twice as bad as actually being pro-vaccine.

America is listening, but they are smart enough to see the outcrop of tares the vaccine industrial complex has sown amongst the truth.

America does not reject parents of vaccine-injured children. There's just too many kids. America is rejecting the bogus people who have witnessed their own child's regression into Autism and still claim to support mass vaccination.

Monday, December 8, 2008

Only To Find They Laughed In Spite

When somebody saw something they didn't like to see, they said something. This got somebody else to say what they thought needed to be said in order to force the revisionism they desired.

As a result, in response, somebody else did what really didn't need to be done. They deliberately changed things to obfuscate the innocent truth and avoid further perception.

You want to know something? Mainline revisionism has been the most bogus part of the Thimerosal issue.

One day, a piece of information says one thing, then the next it gets changed just because somebody noticed it said what it said.


You sit there at the computer checking your facts, and watch these people alter stuff after the fact. It goes beyond taking the fifth, it goes to take the stupid.

Revisionism like this is crazy mostly because the dopes don't comprehend people have already got five inch stacks of information printed up, including the pre-revisionism versions of what was said.

If you want to be smart, the old advice is you have to stay on your toes because people like to drop the other guy's pants in public to force them to stow away the truth!

Well, when somebody said what they thought needed to be said in order to "out" the other guy, somebody else captured what needed to be captured figuring that the "outing" of what was originally said would end up in the media which would then lead to the revisionism and/or redaction.

It did lead to the revisionism, but by capturing the changes, it makes the fact that their revisions/redactions to mainline information are not going to mean much when things are reconciled later on.
The scary part is the loss of scientific reality. Just because somebody felt uncomfortable about the information as it was, they tattled and got it changed.

Rather than say something about the immature, sophomoric, "high school for money" people and their disastrous, trail of polluted methods which are almost always regressing the issue to a gunslinger publicity stunt level, think about how forcing things like this revisionism/redaction affects future lives.

How many systematic after-vaccination events will now not get reported because somebody does not have complete information?


Who knows?

Friday, November 21, 2008

"Preemption" Preemption?

Preemption is defined as "the right of purchasing before others" or "a prior seizure or appropriation : a taking possession before others".

As for vaccine court, the idea of "preemption" has been the dividing line all along. Does the vaccine marketplace have exclusive rights before the civil rights of citizens? Congress seems to think so. They agreed to create preemption when they created vaccine court.

It's not the obligation of parents to determine if the vaccine marketplace has been honest, open, or deliberately obfuscating the deleterious adverse events typically consistent with vaccinating infants and toddlers. Congress has blasted the drug companies for Vioxx, etc. conducting investigations and holding hearings, but they never peel the biologics banana.

As Thimerosal is reportedly heading to the U.S. Supreme Court, one thing to keep in mind is that a drug company believes Thimerosal has some sort of legal "preemption".

Remember the Eli Lilly rider.

The fact that the pharmaceutical lobby has tried repeatedly to provide Thimerosal "preemption" in the form of liability immunity legislation doesn't support this, their latest theory. The Supremes should reject Thimerosal preemption being sought.

If the high court agrees to preemption, they will effectively establish the divine right of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The only problem with that is we are a Constitutional Democracy.

There's no divine right for kings in our land, much less a divine right to Thimerosal poison American infants and toddlers. It's just zany to suggest that a government agency or their partner in policy-making is entitled to a divine right.

I wish a graphic containing the statistics from vaccine court claims would suddenly appear to the left of this text. If it did, I might wonder why the number of claims for Autism dropped to nothing (not exactly *nothing*) at a time of unprecedented publicity.

The glaring issue with all of us today should be this practice of holding court without an actual trial. Prejudice is very ugly. Preemption is prejudice.

Politics is the business of exchanging favors, justice isn't. One good thing about vaccine court is that it equalizes claims. There's no such thing as major client status. The people imprisoned behind the walls of the gated communities have to accept justice, for all.

There's always a likelihood that the drug companies have already covered their bases, but as long as vaccine court exists drug companies won't be bankrupted by a handful of the power mongering Autism elitists.

Remedy must come from the courts, but if the drug company-backed pro-vaccine lynch mob led by the likes of Paul Offit and a surprising black-ops team has their way, the proof of harm will never see the light of day and justice is limited to the cherry-picked few children born to the well-heeled.

If that's a class issue to you, make that a lack of class issue in proper context.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Don't Count On The Denialcrats


Remember when vaccine court finally started hearing Autism cases? The national spotlight was on the Cedillo family as attention came to the story of their daughter Michelle.

Then Yee Haw, KA-BLOOEY.

Somebody dropped a really stinky bomb on the attentive media at just the wrong time for all of our families. Within just a few days time the tabloid prank A.K.A. the totally maudlin Sponge Bob klan "rift" indirection swiped away the attention Michelle and her loving family deserved.

Hey, remember when somebody told us all how Autism Speaks rocks and how wonderful the Combating Autistics Act was going to be for all of our children?

Remember how it turned out? Our vaccine-injured children got stabbed in the back for "a billion dollar's worth" of whatever it was actually spent on? Remember how Texas Rep. Joe Barton was smeared by a band of creeps most likely to personally benefit financially from CAA passage?

Remember how people were always telling us how bad President George Bush was and if their friends had control good things like justice and positive changes were going to happen? That was almost two years ago, and the only friends our children have in Congress are the same ones who've been fighting the drug lobby and their partners occupying Congressional seats.

Remember during his campaign when John McCain fearlessly mentioned that he had an unfavorable opinion about Thimerosal? And who made sure that every arch-enemy of our vaccine-injured children knew exactly what Senator McCain said?

Remember when somebody attempted to smear Senator McCain because he wouldn't lend his political pulpit so this person could scream green, green, vaccine?

The Ophenomenon is certainly pulling the pants down on these people in public now. The Denialcrats rejected McCain's singly made promise to each of our families and smeared anybody unwilling to drink their "everthing is..." koolaid.

Guess what? Obama is in and his chief of staff is a guy who engineered mass Thimerosal-poisoning American infants and toddlers during his Hillarycare days.

If that wasn't enough now the Denialcrats are working hard to get pharmaceutical giant Merck lawyer Eric Holder in as Attorney General.

Yes, you haven't choked on a ham and cheese to the point you are seeing things reprobate, the bad-bad Denialcrats want a Merck attorney in at the top Department of Justice.


Monday, November 17, 2008

Shaw Said What Needed To Be Said

The following are some quotes from The Doctor's Dilemma written by Dr. George Bernard Shaw. It is suggested in life that we eat the cherries and spit out the pits. With Shaw you accept his inevitable direction-less gusts of hot air in hopes of picking up goodies.

Google books is thank worthy for digitizing this work.


The Doctor's Dilemma A Tragedy By Bernard Shaw, George Bernard Shaw

Text not available


Text not available


Text not available


Text not available


Text not available


Text not available
The Doctor's Dilemma A Tragedy By Bernard Shaw, George Bernard Shaw

Thursday, November 13, 2008

This Does NOT Make Sense


Something isn't making sense. A few years back U.S. vaccine authorities added the letter "V" to the MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella vaccine). What that means is Varicella (Chicken Pox) was added to the MMR and the three in one shot became a four in one shot.

According to reports, the MMRV vaccine actually contained ten times (10X)the normal amount of Varicella as the single Chicken Pox vaccine has.

The tricky part about that is apparently lots and lots of individual U.S. states don't consider Varicella a reportable disease.

Aside from making one wonder how in the world the introduction of a 10X modified Chicken Pox vaccine/component post-license tracking will go over, it seems impossible that such a contagious disease isn't one that federal and state health departments want to keep track of. The vaccine marketplace has to prove to the public that a vaccine is a necessity, right? If they don't keep statistics...

The state of Ohio reported Varicella and they saw a giant jump in reported cases between 2005 and 2006. In 2005 there were 2021 reported cases of Chicken Pox on-sets. In 2006 the number jumped all the way up to 8,859.


What really doesn't make sense is knowing Ohio, one of the states actually reporting the disease, saw an incredible jump in Chicken Pox in 2006 to well over 8,000 cases.

It's strange because a few dozen mostly unavoidable cases of Measles popping up here and there across the country seemingly constitutes a major outbreak in the minds of pro-vaccine health officials. It's true that not a single death typically comes out of these so called Measles outbreaks, and most cases get better, but it's also true that there is no Autism among the unvaccinated population.

The media hasn't reported (maybe they have) the pandemic infestation of Chicken Pox in Ohio of 2006 nor have they informed the public of the full details concerning why the MMRV vaccine was pulled off the market due to the fact that an outbreak of seizures commenced with the outbreak of MMRV. By contrast the 2006 Iowa Mumps outbreak was reported as a doomsday visitation until officials discovered that the MMR vaccine failed to protect 87% of the college kids against the Mumps.

For a while, the CDC even claimed to know which plane the Mumps flew into Iowa on. But when people began to see that the MMR vaccine was failing all over the place then *POOF* story disappeared.

It's also strange that the media almost always claims that the Measles cases that do pop up across the country, nearly 100% of the time, relate to a person most recently on foreign travel entering America via passenger jet, not spreading Measles to fellow passengers, then suddenly bursting out with contagious Measles infection once on American soil.

Strange too, are the reports coming out of the UK that authorities in a futile effort to knock down Measles are RE-vaccinating with the MMR within a month of previous MMR vaccination. Vaccination rates aren't low enough to suggest that concerns over Autism are responsible for Measles. They never have been either.

Read this from pro-vaccine health officials (with the gigantic 2006 Ohio Varicella spread and the fact that authorities are attempting to vaccine older folks with a Shingles vaccine in mind):


Can a vaccinated person who develops a mild case of chickenpox still spread the disease? Yes. Vaccinated persons who get this milder form of chickenpox may still spread the disease to others who are not protected. Therefore, these individuals should stay at home until the blisters have formed scabs or if there are no blisters present, until no new spots or bumps are forming.


Is the vaccine effective in preventing all cases of chickenpox?
No vaccine is 100% effective in preventing disease. For chickenpox vaccine, about 9 out of every 10 people who are vaccinated with two doses are completely protected from chickenpox. In addition, the recommended two-dose regimen is virtually 100% effective in preventing severe disease. If a vaccinated person does get chickenpox, it is usually a very mild case lasting only a few days and involving fewer skin lesions (usually less than 50, which may resemble bug bites more than typical, fluid-filled chickenpox blisters), mild or no fever, and a quicker recovery.

Not counting cases of Chicken Pox during the first run of 10x Varicella MMRV brews makes almost as much sense as the U.S. Congress telling the Centers for Disease Control to stop counting Autism right in the middle of an Autism epidemic.

UPDATED INFORMATION: There was a 2004 small-scale outbreak of Varicella among vaccinated children. The vaccinated faired no better than unvaccinated. 15 out of 115 Varicella-vaccinated students at a Nebraska elementary school contracted the disease while 18 unvaccinated children did.

Parents wisely rejected attempts to Varicella vaccinate school kids during the small episode. The vaccine was ineffective (there were just as many vaccinated children sick with Chicken Pox as unvaccinated children). They also rejected additional Varicella vaccination based on the fact that cases of Chicken Pox coincided with the vaccine requirement and vaccinated children were contracting the disease in equal numbers to unvaccinated children.






Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Go Ahead And Jump

The pro-vaccine information compile-ists over at International Vaccine Rescue are busy convincing parents of children with vaccine-induced autism to write letters.

With this campaign it is hoped that the ears of in-coming national executive leadership will unclog.

Leave it to International Vaccine Rescue to stampede letters when a simple spare Q-tip is more appropriate to do the job.

It's ordinary common sense that if face to face dialogue failed, and it failed miserably in previous meetings, it's essential to shake off the the dust of the city in the sandals and move on.

Appeasement is the indelible stripe that forever marks the coward yellow. Despite the best peace efforts of those living inside the green zones of America, neighbors and country club pals of the vaccine industry, the carnage remains undressed and festering for the rest of us.

Letters carried in the talons of pro-vaccine vultures?

In the fatherland from which brought forth Merck the deserving language is, "Du bist ein dummer esel." That is "you are one stupid donkey!"

Such letters are symbolic of prayers and petitions to heaven made by honest, hard-working parents. They will certainly find their way into the uncaring hands of evil-doing immune system scoffers who, without even looking, automatically deny every child under two the on-board at birth power to fight off diseases, namely the in-coming national executive leadership.

What about these letters? Do they talk about their child sacrifices to the shamgods of SIDS or the price of gold left at the symbolic foot of telescoping bowels totem poles? Do they talk about the non-benign hocus pocus involved in unnaturally seeding disease into the bodies of every child under two?

"We aren't anti-vaccine?" Well duh? Your kid is autistic.

Monday, November 10, 2008

America's New Deal

Did you think for a minute that your phone call to your Congressional representation was gonna stop the $875,000,000,000.00 corporate bail out?

Take a look at your pay stub. Is more and more of your income being locked in to fuel the prosperity of a corporation? If you pay taxes it sure is.

Now that the election is over, the media co-factor has the courage to report your 401 savings taxation is subject to change. They knew it all along, but didn't report anything because they stand to gain profits for their parent companies. It's estimated that this exposure will net $85,000,000.00 in side money each and every year. It won't take long for the looters in suits to figure out what to do next.

You can call Congress if you want, but remember the money-croppers know exactly when to harvest your garden, and the U.S. government knows how to raise tax revenue to pay for $850,000,000,000.00 bail outs.


Life in America isn't so futile as it is feudal.

One 2008 presidential candidate, Mitt Romney said the reason 47,000,000 Americans are uninsured is because they refuse to play the game.

Now what kind of a deaf, dumb, and blind statement is that for a presidential candidate in need of the popular vote to make? It certainly takes a lot of free market to take so many Americans for granted. Liberty is now a refusal to play into a corporate scheme?

In this age of know-everythings, your income is being ear-marked by those who have the power to take whatever they feel they are entitled to. Just try to stop them.

Your representatives on Capitol Hill, they'll be the ones wearing the brown paper bags on their heads, know too well that if one tries to intervene on behalf of consumers one is trashed by three dozen lobbyists as wrecking their free market. To the untrained eye, lobbyists are sorted by which group is going to bleed us directly from the veins and which ones are using leeches?

The politicians like to say "if it moves, tax it. If it continues to move, regulate it. But if you regulate it, you will inevitably end up subsidizing it." Sounds real noble. But what they say and actually do are two different things.

One observer said corporations have become so big that even if there's a three percent chance of failure it's too risky for Congress to not bail them out. At the same time corporations have lobbied their way into a historic risk-free environment.

In far too many cases and questions lobbyists stand directly opposed to American interests.

Example:

A heat pump won't work. The reversing valve part is $200.00 or less. The heat pump repair company wants $800.00 for the part, to install it and fill the system back up with refrigerant. That's a whopping $600.00 (300%) more than the cost of the part, and $800.00 is 40% of the cost for a totally new heat pump outside unit of $2000.00.

The problem is, neither option is good because the deal is cost-prohibitive to the home-owner. So exercising American liberty the home-owner piles on extra blankets and the family dresses warmer. In the astute eyes of politicians this upsets the heat pump repair free market. By not spending to fix the reversing valve the economy is crashing and burning. "It's all in utter ruins."

The failure is instead of lowering their unreasonable prices to match the ability of the consumer to pay for repairs, the heat pump repair company spends $600.00 to hire a lobbyist who drops a legislative bill requiring all homes to have operating heat pump systems.

Americans are the economy. Corporations (big business) are in direct competition with the American people. Big business hates welfare. It's creepy to see businessmen and businesswomen fighting against the poor, needy and disabled. The reason is because it screws up the rich man's entitlements and corporate subsidies.

That's America's new deal. Let the great American Stand-off begin.

Saturday, November 8, 2008

The Game Of Semantics

Is it OK to have pharmaceutical industry people on television to make unsubstantiated health claims concerning vaccines? What happens if their noses fail to grow on-camera? How can viewers tell?

America realized that Saturday morning cartoons dream worked by the grain mills' public relations departments and produced by big-time ad agencies were turning American children into sugar junkies enriched with government-sanctioned B vitamin heebe geebees.

The sugar fix got so bad that in 1969 the Federal Communications Commission made a ruling that prohibited cartoon characters from appearing in advertisements on the same program.

Until the FCC establishes some kind of Martha Stewart rule which would prohibit canned medical promotions on television, as a rule of thumb, if a person with an M.D. degree being paid by a pharmaceutical company is on TV to jabber they probably aren't doing too well as a practicing doctor, and the network is taking product placement money to push favorable ideas about medically unnecessary stuff into your dialectal version of the coconut.

Capping campaign contributions made by Americans at $25 makes sense because a campaign contribution is really just an attempt to bribe somebody to make sure they vote for what you want.

In this age of "lifestyles" or "healthstyles" or worse "me-styles" what would happen if all Americans were limited to making just a single $25 campaign contribution per candidate per term or election season?

The answer is easy. Big business including corporations, trade groups, non-profit organizations, and various associations would have all the say, not only in Washington D.C., but across the entire nation because there is no politician willing to equalize the playing field.

So limit corporation contributions to the same $25 limits and guess what? There are a lot more Americans giving campaigns $25 dollars than corporations.

The media in America isn't too powerful, it's too slippery. Editorial discretion over content yields to, ad department deals, legal intimidation and the awful reasoning of production values. Production values rarely involve anything other than assuring advertisers, political pressure groups, etc. control both sides of the argument.

Unless something is done to eliminate corporate campaign money, Americans will continue to be reduced into nothing else, but them. One look at the Oxygen deal between Sponge Bob and Sister Marx Brother is all Americans need to know about the unfairness doctrine currently at jiffy deluxe levels.



Friday, November 7, 2008

Of Steak Knives and Royally Stupid Choices

Be very careful of Obama. We all know his campaign rhetoric did not include the promise of reaching out a hand to the parents of vaccine-injured children in America.

Since naming Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff, any promise of a helping hand now might translate to a mean-spirited guy attacking our children with a steak knife in that hand.

Don't call the messenger crazy because the messenger lives over in England. I just read in the UK Telegraph that Mr. Rahm Emanuel has a thing for sharp objects.

"One story, more than any other, sums up the intensity, loyalty and, at times, downright nastiness upon which Mr Emanuel's reputation is built.

At a dinner to celebrate President Clinton's first election victory, Mr Emanuel began to name those who he believed had earned his enmity. As he listed the names of those he saw as traitors, he grabbed a steak knife, stood up and began plunging the knife into the table and shouting "Dead! Dead! Dead!" after each name.

"When he was done, the table looked like a lunar landscape," one witness recalled."

Frankly, Mr. Rahm Emanuel does sound as demented as he frequently looks. If you aren't sure, sitting at the supper table at the White House stabbing things with a steak knife is not appropriate. It's very demented. It might be a problem for the president-elect because Mr. Obama really doesn't have the laying on of hands power to cast out demons. He just pretends to.

In 1993 it was Rahm Emanuel who engineered Hillarycare. His father was a pediatrician and his mom had been in nursing making him the most likely person to help Hillary Clinton push for more vaccines and that meant more doses of vaccines that had Thimerosal in them.

It was young Rahm Emanuel that sliced his finger in the fast food joint, and, instead of getting it stitched up, went swimming in Lake Michigan. His finger was most likely infected so badly with Tetanus that he almost died. This would certainly add to his pro feelings toward vaccinations.

As you know the only part of Hillarycare that made it through Congress was the part that began to inject increasing amounts of neurotoxic ethylmercury into the bodies of America's infants and toddlers. Unofficially kept statistics indicate Autism climbed 6000% since Hillary Clinton nationalized her first lady of Arkansas program of vaccinating every child by two.

Thimerosal is still in the shots. They're just telling America it's not. Vaccine makers don't have to tell us how much mercury is in the shots and the FDA has a don't ask and don't test ethylmercury policy. The CDC, IOM, AAP, etc. have a long-standing no-show policy which thanks to Autism Speaks legislation prohibits federal dollars for Thimerosal and vaccine research.

Incredibly, the federal government is still substituting tuna mercury numbers for their lack of a Thimerosal safe exposure one. They have done nothing in the nine years since they first discovered that there was no such thing as a safe exposure to Thimerosal. This will not change in the next four years.

I have little doubt that Mr. Rahm Emanuel (evidently not related to God With Us) is pre-disposed to inappropriately influence the new White House concerning the still currently pending Thimerosal issue. Adding weight to concern is the fact that our children and families have so precious few allies.

In naming a man among the America's most wanted Thimerosal thugs, Obama clearly is going to continue the U.S. government policy of mercury obfuscation.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Obummer

The more things change the more they stay the same. If you are the parent of a vaccine-injured child, that is.

What is time to the truly patient?

If you voted for Obama thinking he will changes things for the vaccine-injured you are happy. Return to your homes and wait for Obama's great promise of deliverance. Don't forget to hold your breath until he comes.


If you voted for John McCain because you need to secure vaccine-injury compensation on behalf of your child to care for your vaccine-injured child it's pretty clear you get the shaft, again.


Let's get this straight. Obama doesn't care about your child's mercurial problems. John McCain and Sarah Palin said they did. Obama ignored the Thimerosal moms he encountered on the campaign trail. John McCain and Sarah Palin really couldn't. Obama has pledged to support the CDC position on Thimerosal completely. John McCain and Sarah Palin said they didn't. Obama is against vaccination choices for parents. John McCain and Sarah Palin said they weren't.

Tomorrow is the first day of your education. Obama is a liar. He and his friends fooled you. In the Senate, his staff played the same old tired trick of inserting his name on lots of non-specific junk law to fool you into believing that he's doing something to help your kid. Obama supported lots of bogus bills to trick you into believing he cares. Yet if you look at the bills, to Obama, all disability is the same.

So what's different about Obama than say George W. Bush?

The large number of silly people employed to snow-job you into believing there is a difference.



Monday, November 3, 2008

VOTE FOR JOHN McCAIN

A McCain White House pledges to benefit America's volumes of vaccine-injured children


Since he totally supports the no show Thimerosal position the bad guys in Atlanta have been maintaining, Obama will no doubt carry the CDC vote 100%. That's really queer.

Hey, you can bet Paul Offit will cast his vote for Obama, too. Offit loves Obama because he's officially against parents making choices about which vaccines their children get, if any. Offit loves Obama also because he is officially against parents opting their infants and toddlers out of the vaccine mandates.

That's an Obama position that directly supports the same mass vaccination policies which created the American Autism Epidemic.

Unfortunately, Obama and his pro-vaccine friends in the democratic party got our children into this mess, and since they have had the spotlight all to themselves, they, alone, continue to be the greatest obstacle a parent of an vaccine-injured child could imagine.

The preservative republican backed by the pharmaceutical companies are long gone.

Whatever thrills the idea of an Obama White House gives the pro-vaccine democrats is certainly centered around the fact that, if Obama gets in, they get by being able to hide the truth about what's happened to hundreds of thousands of kids for four more years.

The CDC, IOM, AAP, and others know Obama, with the help of drug company fronted charities currently impeding Thimerosal and vaccine research, will continue to fund and support their efforts to keep blocking our children's progress.

These are things parents of vaccine-injured children need to vote against. These are certainly things beyond injustice, our family dignity, and actually are extremely disgraceful and all of us can agree will inflict for more years of inhuman treatment.

Just looking at the list of do-nothing legislation Obama has supported should tell us all that Obama has nothing tangible to offer our children. A vote for Obama is to agree to four more years of unnecessary vaccinations, more Thimerosal poisonings, more disgraceful junk science, and lots of fresh victims for Obama sponsored disability programs.

'The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.' - Ronald Reagan


John McCain, together with our ally Senator Joe Lieberman, called for Congressional hearings to stop Autism research money from being flushed down the toilet. John McCain has listened to you when nobody else is. He has not dismissed your words as parents. He has pledged to fight for our children.

John McCain added Sarah Palin because she knows the Thimerosal issue. We can maintain trust in John McCain's choice. Her sister is an ASD mom.

McCain gets our vote because he has pledged to reform these obfuscating government agencies. It was John McCain who fought to remove the Eli Lilly rider from the Homeland Security Act. He stood in harm's way for our children before and stands to aid our children any way he can. Take a hard look at the gang of fourteen engineered by John McCain. It was all about stopping Thimerosal liability legislators.

John McCain has gone to bat for our children and he needs all of us as his wingmen and wingwomen. He has dared to open up the Autism issue like no other candidate has ever done. We have to cover his back.



VOTE AGAINST FOUR MORE YEARS OF GOVERNMENT COVER-UP.

VOTE FOR JOHN McCAIN




Obama Will NOT Benefit Vaccine-Injured Kids


The Obama campaign has already confessed that they will fully support the CDC's position of no connection between vaccines and Autism.

The Obama campaign has officially rejected vaccine choice.
The CDC, a strong partner of GE/Autism Speaks, was so secure that Jenny McCarthy, at latest a failed NBC Universal sit-com actress, would NOT talk about Thimerosal and vaccines they didn't even bother to request Oprah read their "official" vaccine disclaimer the last time "warrior one" was on her show.

So what if John McCain didn't meet with Jenny McCarthy, the out of work Indigo Mom?

Colin Powell, the man who willingly sold the notion of Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction to the United Nations, did. To the left is photographic proof.

Powell has already endorsed Barack Obama.

We have to see through the smoke and turn the mirrors on these creepy people screwing around with our children's issue.

Vote For John McCain this Tuesday. It will get better for our vaccine-injured kids if we do.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Friends of ASD Kids Please Vote McCain

ASD parents should be wise enough by now to understand that as a U.S. senator John McCain has fought for our children. The McCain-Palin ticket is the way to go this election. Click Here

Senator Barack Obama has pledged to support the CDC position concerning the Thimerosal issue. If you vote for him you will get four more years of Thimerosal obfuscation. Mr. Obama has officially stated he is totally against parents making vaccine choices for their children. He believes in mass vaccination policies which have clearly led to prolific increases of Autism and related neurological disorders. He is opposed to parental choice.

At this hour we've learned that he intends to appoint former Hillarycare cabalist Rep. Rahm Emanuel to his inner circle of advisors should Obama be elected to the White House. This is most likely a major reason to reject Obama completely.

For beginning in 1993 Emanuel, the son of a pediatrician, was a player in the Hillarycare cabal which led to the proliferation of Thimerosal-containing vaccines which in turn led to the proliferation of Autism spectrum disorders in America.

For more on Emanuel, you can also try to view
Hillarycare records at the Clinton Library, but as the NBC TODAY SHOW reported most everything concerning healthcare has been redacted.

Talking about Thimerosal was the big reason Don Imus was kicked off the airwaves.
Click Here for The Imus Incident.

Enough about our children's enemies. Let all of us focus on making sure that the Thimerosal issue becomes the key issue determining the next president.

John McCain has been as candid as he possibly can concerning the Thimerosal issue. He will see to it that our government comes clean, and our children's needs are raised to the level of importance they deserve. Sarah Palin is not unfamiliar with ASD. Her sister has a child with Autism.

Let's not forget that disgusting "midnight rider" the preservative republicans slapped onto the tail-end of the Homeland Security bill in 2002. You know, the Eli Lilly rider designed to provide liability protection to Eli Lilly against Thimerosal-induced Autism that came over from the White House at 10:10 PM and was inserted into the Homeland Security Act?

From the New York Times article "Whose Hands Are Dirty?" November 25, 2002

"Senator John McCain of Arizona characterized the provision as ''among the most inappropriate'' in the homeland security legislation. He said: ''This language will primarily benefit large brand-name pharmaceutical companies which produce additives to children's vaccines -- with substantial benefit to one company in particular. It has no bearing whatsoever on domestic security.''

John McCain gave his word that he would fight to remove the rider, and guess what? It was removed.

He has given us his word that as president of the United States he will listen to us parents and will fight for our children against the government agencies obfuscating mercury's menance.

John McCain continued to fight against Thimerosal liability protection efforts. He and few others banded together to to form the gang of fourteen.

They fought over and over against as Bill Frist and Hillary Clinton tried repetitively to slip Thimerosal language into countless bills. And when it became clear that Hillary Clinton and Bill Frist were blocking Thimerosal and vaccine research, together John McCain and fellow Autism ally Joe Lieberman composed a letter to the U.S. Senate H.E.L.P committee calling out the lack of Thimerosal and vaccine research and calling FOR Senate hearings concerning the Combating Autism Act fiasco.

Sometimes the answer is easy. Not an easy answer. We will never give up.
Please encourage all of your family members and family friends to vote for the best advocate for your ASD child, John McCain and Sarah Palin.

If the breeze has just blown you and you are reading this please help us rally by spreading the word to your friends. Our children are mercury poisoned and we need all Americans to stand with us. Not only in defense of our children, but future children as well.


Please vote for John McCain this Tuesday and tell others to do the same.




Friday, October 31, 2008

Offit's Mouth Is Where His Money Is

"During the last considerable epidemic at the turn of the century, I was a member of the Health Committee of London Borough Council, and I learned how the credit of vaccination is kept up statistically by diagnosing all the revaccinated cases (of smallpox) as pustular eczema, varioloid or what not---except smallpox."---George Bernard Shaw


Best wishes attempting to find out what constituted a placebo during the clinical trials of Paul Offit's vaccine invention. Was his vaccine truly tested against a benign placebo, or was it matched up against a previous failed version of a rotavirus vaccine and caused slightly less iatrogenic damage?

Why wouldn't America like to know what the ingredients of these so called placebos are?

For most Americans it will come as a surprise to learn that very often clinical trials aren't netural versus unknown. It's more like an OK Corral wager situation of the less worse of two bads walks away with bloody hands.

Most likely the reason Dr. Offit's placebo is a medical mystery to the general public is this is just another case where drug companies do something like match a Thimerosal-containing vaccine against a Thimerosal-containing placebo then say there is no evidence of an association of negative neurological outcomes.

The same relates to the reason Congress fails to act in the public interests by requiring further study, and as a result, federal agencies refuse to conduct an Autism study of the vaccinated versus unvaccinated. The federal government can't study vax vs. un-vax because they already know there is no significant rate of Autism among unvaccinated people. If they do officially confirm no Autism in the unvaccinated population it will be the end of mass vaccination policies.

Just how sloppy are FDA-approved vaccine clinical trials? A search of VAERS, vaccine adverse events reporting system, found one 2007 entry for Rotateq vaccine using 'placebo' entered as a symptom. The adverse event took place six years earlier in 2001. It reads:

"It was noted that the patient participated in a clinical trial for Rotateq and was not sure if her daughter received the placebo or the vaccine." "within a week of receiving the vaccine the patient experienced diarrhea on and off." "Medical attention was sought through a physician." "No labs or diagnostic studies were performed." " The patient outcome was not recovered."

The Offit rotavirus vaccine is referred to at VAERS as 'ROTHB5'.

A VAERS search using 'ROTHB5' and 'INTUSSUSCEPTION' as a symptom produced 429 separate adverse events reports. Substituting 'INTUSS' as a symptoms produced 431 separate reports.

Using 'ROTHB5' and including 'SURGICAL' and 'SURGERY' alternately as symptoms produced 248 separate reports. Using 'ROTHB5' and 'DIED?' produced 89 VAERS death reports.

By contrast, a previous rotavirus vaccine marketed by Wyeth(RV)VAERS search produced 156 reports of intussusception and 14 deaths.

Parents can search the VAERS material at:

http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.html

The Offit vaccine is 'ROTHB5'. There's overwhelming evidence that his vaccine is associated with telescoping bowels (intussusception). Pay close attention to how many cases of intussusception report positive rotavirus lab data.

UPDATE 11/2/08

Adding the following information:

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/63074.php

Article Date: 15 Feb 2007

The FDA says it is issuing the notice to remind people that intussusception is a potential complication of the RotaTeq vaccine, and to encourage them to report cases of intussusception so that the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) can assess the risks associated with the vaccine.

They would like US healthcare professionals and others to report any cases of this or other adverse events associated with RotaTeq to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).

If your child has stomach pain, vomiting and diarrhea, there is blood in the child's stool or changes in bowel movements, these could be signs of intussusception and you should tell the doctor straight away.

The FDA says that intussusception can occur spontaneously in the absence of vaccination and they do not know whether any of the 28 reported cases were caused by RotaTeq or just coincidence.

Of the 28 cases reported so far, about half of them occurred within 21 days of vaccination and 16 of the infants had to have surgery. The other children were treated without surgery, using enemas. No deaths were reported.

PLEASE VISIT:

https://secure.vaers.org/VaersDataEntryintro.htm

TO REPORT ANY ADVERSE EVENTS RELATING TO VACCINES.

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

A More Excellent Way

Just read a study that claimed nine hundred serum samples from pregnant women were obtained for testing. It said measles and rubella immunity among the pregnant ladies were 88% and 98%, respectively, and the two immunities did not appear to interfere with each other.

So what about their babies?

If this high level of immunity is consistent among all moms-to-be why is vaccination of their newborn infants still considered to be a necessity?

The public needs to understand that these mommies with big bellies deliver babies, not storks. Immunity to disease is delivered from the mommy to the infant, too.

Mythbusters can try to prove it on their TV show, but even if storks could generate enough lift to carry a baby they wouldn't know where to go because they can't read addresses, and they can't stand while trying to turn the pages of the phone book or holding down a city map in the wind. Plus, somebody would have taken UFO video of them before.

To date, the CDC has nothing to refute that diseases stop in parts of the world before vaccination is ever employed.

While every child deserves to be scientifically screen-tested in order to indicate whether or not each child does, in fact, require something to trick their bodies into becoming sick in order to make them immune for when the real sickness tries to make them sick so they will have a full life of disease immunity, nobody actually clinically proves a vaccine is a medical necessity.

The study establishes that immunity exists in pregnant women A-OK.

This study suggested that vaccinating babies for measles is 88% unnecessary and for mumps is 98% unnecessary.

The study did not prove that pregnant women's immunity, indeed, carries over to their babies, thus protecting them long enough for their immature bodies to develop their own immune system.

The study did not prove that babies these mommies delivered had no immunity, nor did it prove these babies had no ability to fight off a vaccine-induced immune challenge.



If the study did prove these babies had no ability to fight off a vaccine-induced immune challenge such iatrogenic measures would be exposed. Undigested things are not supposed to enter the human body because of what might happen.

So despite the myths propagated by unethical CDC officials and Every Child By Two sadists, we have to believe that everything necessary to prevent most all childhood diseases from affecting infants and toddlers is pre-loaded and on-board at birth.


Tuesday, October 21, 2008

To The Mars, Alice!

What is Autism? Autism is a one-million seat rocket carrying American infants and toddlers on a government-funded Every Child By Two field-trip to Mars.

At stardate -331782.21835362754, the launch directors know something is terribly wrong with their rocket. They discover they screwed up and the rocket in flight is going to miss the intended planet so badly that there isn't enough money in the budget to pay for a recovery mission.

They also momentarily consider the cost in human resources. They learn that a single lost of life is a tragedy, but a million losses of life is just statistics. They hold bullet meetings all over the place and quickly detach themselves as a means of self-preservation.

As snowballs are known to grow, rather than inform the parents of this tragedy, essentially the entire launch operation has bolted the doors and not allowed anyone in or out. They reassure themselves that they are the experts and vaunt in front of each other approvingly at their secret public meetings held behind closed doors.
To spare themselves of an emotional bad day they are told to cut off all communications with their rocket. The unsuspecting children are left entirely abandoned hurtling through space.

Most of the mothers and fathers have that internal instinct that tells them the silence means something is wrong.

At first, the parents gathering at the launch site by the seashore are united, courteously waiting for some word. Only problem is the launch directors have avowed to never disclose, not a thing. They convince the media to embargo the entire story, and hire PR specialists to do the rest.
Many parents can't deal with reality. They convince themselves that "no word" from ground control means nothing is wrong. They can't see the rocket and accept their star-voyagers are all well.
Others hear talk, but decide to accept the loss of their children trusting that at least future space field trip rules will be written in the blood of their children.

Some parents look around and discover they are well-equipped and well-connected enough to handle things. They slip away from the crowd and start packing for just another road trip.

Then there are those parents who refuse to accept this failure. These Parents of La Mancha can not accept life as it is. They burn in their hearts to make things as it should be. They have all the heart to do battle with all the dragons, but their hearts are really broken. Their faith among faithlessness forces them to rip their broken hearts out for all the world to see too often and they burn out a lot.
They want people to see their love and devotion. They hope that putting a face on the tragedy will change things for others.

Another group of parents sell the house and try to swim to Mars. They've seen other parents have rescued their kids, but they don't have much to say and certainly just want to put it all behind them. Those willing to swim to Mars learn you gotta have a rocket. It takes money to make it to Mars and back. Their recovery plan requires ground control to admit their mistake and pay them compensation.

Ground control smiles because they know the point of no return. The statute miles of limitations are logging away. The bottom-feeders are brought in to clean them up.

After a while, the launch directors assess their risk management works A-OK, they've got paying sponsors and lots of rockets to fire, so they announce that more field-trips will be launched.

That's Autism.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Don't Kid Yourself...McCain Is Our A-Man

Don't kid yourself, only one presidential candidate spoke about Autism during last night's debate. After that, the other guy listened to the voice in his ear, twitched in his right eye, then responded to the issue in terms of making a ice cold point about a stated policy which would be in conflict.

This is what was said during the third and final debate.

JOHN MCCAIN said this: "She'll be my partner. She (Palin) understands reform. And, by the way, she also understands special-needs families. She understands that autism is on the rise, that we've got to find out what's causing it, and we've got to reach out to these families, and help them, and give them the help they need as they raise these very special needs children."

BARAK OBAMA said this: "I do want to just point out that autism, for example, or other special needs will require some additional funding, if we're going to get serious in terms of research. That is something that every family that advocates on behalf of disabled children talk about."


JOHN MCCAIN then said this: "But again, I want to come back to, notice every time Senator Obama says, "We need to spend more, we need to spend more, that's the answer" -- why do we always have to spend more? Why can't we have transparency, accountability, reform of these agencies of government? Maybe that's why he's asked for 860 -- sought and proposed $860 billion worth of new spending and wants to raise people's taxes in a time of incredible challenge and difficulty and heartache for the American families.


JOHN MCCAIN continued, later saying "And I just said to you earlier, town hall meeting after town hall meeting, parents come with kids, children -- precious children who have autism. Sarah Palin knows about that better than most. And we'll find and we'll spend the money, research, to find the cause of autism. And we'll care for these young children. And all Americans will open their wallets and their hearts to do so."


Wednesday, October 15, 2008

How Do You Boycott Denis Leary?


Our Autism house is still swirling in confusion after the sui generis comments of Denis Leary.

People say things that need to be said. People say important things that need to be said over and over.

As the father of an Autistic child, I can say that what was said by Denis Leary about Autism is a big mess. It's Denis Leary's big mess. He said what he thought needed to be said, and he said it. It's a big mess.

Does what Denis Leary has said about Autism bother me? Not really. It's a free country, at least some parts of it are still free, so he can say what he wants. We can say is what he said is something he said.

My opinion of his remarks is this: Denis, you make absolutely no sense at all. If your intentions were to stir up a fight, don't worry there's nothing in there about Autism in what you said worthy of a boycott.

What remains to be said is sometimes the media really needs to show some self-respect. That means to qualify the value of what people say and not be afraid to leave something out when what was said makes absolutely no sense at all.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Simpsonwood Minute


The Simpsonwood transcripts tell the story health officials will never tell publicly. The excerpts speak of collusion, obfuscation, and deceit between government agencies and vaccine industry officials. The translation is provided to the reader in order to make the high-brow discourse more intelligible, more human.

Dr. Vito Caserta - Chief Medical Officer for theVaccine Injury Compensation Program "I have a question for Bob. When you did the chart review, Bob, did you look at the zero group to see if there was any obvious difference with that group as opposed to the rest of the cohort, or was that not done? Can you describe the zero group in any other way other than saying that there is a zero group and that's all I know about them, and that they had two polios?"

ONE TRANSLATION: You can not be serious! Are you nuts? Tell me that you didn't actually look to see if the charts reflect zero Thimerosal exposure equals no Autism. None of us care that zero Thimerosal exposure means a no Autism outcome. The only thing we care about is that zero Thimerosal exposure means no vaccinations. It really doesn't matter if we say they had two polio vaccines. Polio vaccine has been around long enough for the public to know it doesn't cause Autism.

Dr. Bob Davis - Associate Professor of Pediatrics and Epidemiology at the University of Washington.
"No, we did the chart review completely separate from exposure. We literally had no idea what the exposure was on purpose and I provided the chart review. Your point is well taken."

ONE TRANSLATION: Dude, relax. We didn't even evaluate Thimerosal exposure when we pulled individual charts. We have no idea it was the Thimerosal on purpose. Do you think I'm gonna actually look at charts to implicate vaccines cause Autism? I don't see it if I don't look, right?

Dr. Tom Clarkson - from an area of frozen tundra in Rochester, New York. "Mr. Chairman, when I look at the paper here, the graphs don't always say zero. The reference. They say less than 37.5, then say less than 25, so are they all referred to zero or not?"

ONE TRANSLATION: I don't like these guys so I'm telling. Mr. Chairman something is screwy with their numbers. They've got the zero exposures thrown in with "less than 37.5" then here with "less than 25". Am I supposed to believe this? Zero Thimerosal exposure is separate, right?

Dr. M. Miles Braun - Director of the Divison of Epidemiology, Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology , Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US FDA "No, but even in those less than 35, they are part of the less than 35 group. I mean they could be excluded from that."

ONE TRANSLATION: No, but don't get upset and throw up about it. Look, just because you noticed that they threw in a bunch of zero exposures to dilute data doesn't mean anybody else will. Try to see the bright side of deception, zero is technically less than 35. Remember the zero group is a bunch of normal kids. Sure, we can take them out of the less than 35, but we're screwed if we do. And you don't want that, do you?

Dr. Bob Chen - Chief of Vaccine Safety and Development at the National Immunization Program at CDC "I think the bottom line is that while the zero group is different, and I think all of us would agree with that, the issue is that it is impossible, unethical to leave kids unimmunized, so you will never, ever resolve that issue...If we can never, ever leave kids unimmunized through these age groups in order to study them ideally as we would like, then of the kids who did become or are left unimmunized for whatever reason, be it that their parents are socially responsible or be it that they have some other pre-existing condition medically, we just have to work with that. If these kids are otherwise normal and they really are just not being immunized because of social circumstances probably, we need to make some judgment as to are they otherwise at risk for the outcomes that we are looking at."

ONE TRANSLATION: So you busted us? Big deal? We all know ethylmercury is a neurotoxin. Who cares if what we've done here is crooked? We're vaccinologists, damn it. We lie for a living. So start lying! So, the unvaccinated don't have detectable levels of Autism. Sure. We've got a few things working in our favor. Look at the positives. The public is brain-washed into accepting mass vaccination. Today we are powerful enough to throw parents in jail for not vaccinating. They'll never go along with the idea of people not vaccinating their children because we've got them living in constant fear. If people with vaccine-induced autistic children fight us, we can blame them for the lack of vaccine protection. We can work with the idea that their children are screwing up everything for everybody else. We can say anything we want and the public will believe us. Look at our titles. We'll have no trouble coming up with a way to spin this.

Dr. Vito Caserta - Chief Medical Officer for theVaccine Injury Compensation Program

"But Bob, a study could be done. You could use the acellular pertussis that doesn't have Thimerosal in ComVax, and have children be immunized, but not have any Thimerosal."

ONE TRANSLATION: I'm the chief medical officer for vaccine court and I'm sitting here telling you how to rig a study designed to exonerate vaccines from causing Autism. I totally ignore what's happened to these children and intend to help you cover it up. People won't know the version in the study isn't a Thimerosal-containing vaccine. They'll just read Hep B vaccine and think it's the Thimerosal-loaded one. Heck, that will save the entire vaccine program!

The Pretending to Combat Autism Act

By Bernard Rimland
Dr. Bernard Rimland was the founder and director of the Autism Research Institute. He passed away in November 2006

I strongly oppose endorsing "The (Pretending to) Combat Autism Act" unless it includes clear and explicit language supporting meaningful research on the role of vaccines and mercury as plausible causes of the autism epidemic.

The proposed Combating Autism legislation is as sincerely dedicated to combating autism as O.J. Simpson was to finding the "real killers" of his ex-wife Nicole.

The fear that failure to pass the CAA will lead to a catastrophic failure to fund future autism research vastly overestimates the value of government funded research. Most such research is only of academic interest, which gathers dust on library shelves and advances the "publish or perish" aspirations of academic researchers. Is there any evidence whatever that more than a miniscule percent of government funded research has produced any positive and useful benefits for autistic children and their families, or ever will? If you are aware of any examples showing such research is serving a truly useful purpose, please let me know.

I was the first to announce the "autism epidemic", in 1995, and I pointed out in that article that excessive vaccines were a plausible cause of the epidemic. As you know, an enormous amount of clinical laboratory research (as opposed to epidemiological research), has been accumulated since that time, supporting my position. (I did not know then that the vaccines contained mercury, although I had been collecting data since 1967 from the mothers of autistic children, on any dental work they may have had during their pregnancy.)

The evidence is now overwhelming, despite the misinformation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Institute of Medicine. Real progress has been made in bringing recovery to autistic children by physicians and researchers who attend the autism/vaccine/mercury connection.

A few million dollars, appropriately directed, has accomplished, and will continue to accomplish much more than the tens of millions of dollars directed along paths intended to exonerate the vaccine manufacturers, the CDC, the IOM and the AAP.

I hope our consortium will purchase, or at least threaten to purchase ads in USA Today an elsewhere saying "Defeat the (Pretend to) Combat Autism Act". We should insist that significant resources be directed at exploiting the treatments that we know work, such as special diets, food supplements and chelation. We have a great deal to gain and nothing to lose by speaking out loudly against this sham legislation which would, in the long run, be harmful rather than beneficial to our children.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Flu Season Follies: CDC Cans Fear...again

Is there a chance now that Americans are beginning to question some of the sour influenza bunk public health officials have been feeding Americans each year? No. That's why this video was recently smuggled in past US Customs agents directly from the CBC. (Canadian Broadcasting Company)



People might recall 'The Big Whiff' of 2003? That year the statistics failed to support the health claims that flu shot works by protecting people against the flu. The US CDC was forced to admit the flu shot offered 0% protection. Think the reason was related to disease mutation of some other futuristic alteration of the universe?

Wrong. The proclaimed experts were forced to admit they got the wrong strain of influenza. But any flu strain is supposed to trigger an antibody response. That's why we're supposed to trust public authorities. That's 0% protection against the flu and lots of bio hazardous waste.

The 2004 flu vaccine was cancelled due to serratia bacteria contamination. The US supply was not halted for our protection by the US FDA, but rather the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. Serratia is a serious lung bacteria which causes pneumonia and renal infections.

http://small-url.com/?7f

US FDA documents indicated that the plant was visited in 2003, but no action was taken. Sounds like a harmless situation easily covered by spray cleaner and a roll of paper towels? Wrong. Just to make sure American flu vaccine marketeers understood the severity of the serratia contamination problems, the MHRA revoked the Liverpool plant's flu vaccine license preventing them from making any more product until the plant was disinfected.

National Institutes of Health researchers did a clinical study of the flu shot and concluded that it does NOT save lives. They reported there had been no change in influenza-related mortality in the elderly during the years 1980 to 2001, despite a greater than fourfold increase in vaccine coverage!

The US CDC was extremely disgraced by creating the bird flu scare. Among the reasons? Scientists at Seoul National University in South Korea fed an extract of kimchi, a spicy Korean variant of sauerkraut, to 13 chickens infected with avian flu, and a week later, 11 of the birds started to recover.

http://small-url.com/?7g

And finally, another great disgrace was a British Medical Journal article written by Harvard grad student Peter Doshi. He pointed out that the CDC states that the historic 1968-9 'Hong Kong flu' pandemic killed 34 000 Americans. At the same time, CDC claims 36 000 Americans annually die from flu. Doshi asked, "What is going on?"


http://small-url.com/?7h

Americans should know that uptake of flu shots is not benign.

Flu shot left executive paralyzed

Flu Shots and Alzheimer's Disease

Saturday, October 11, 2008

Evil People Are Sowing Tares

Precession means step forward. The ancient Greek astronomers discovered that the exact spot where the sun crosses the equator changes by about a foot further to the west each year. This is known as the precession of the equinoxes, or just precession.

Very often a woman's preparation for bathing includes sensuously raising her hair up away from her body.

Bath or Shower hair, whatever you want to call it, is often used in print media and in active-motion media as a means to instantly create intimacy between the observer and the subject.

PR imaging tactics are employed suggestively to trigger thought precession. Thought precession relates to the art of designing mass media so that it triggers the desired thought precession in individuals. It's typically a still photo or graphic because the mind catches up quickly and then takes the next step forward.

If done right the mind will not catch the method of conceptualization, but will react favorable based on what the PR target objective is at some point in time later on.


Graphics do this, too.

The National Center for State Courts, a big business propaganda machine, uses
guided imagery to trigger thought precession of state court officials . NCSC spews toxic, un-American ideas.

Not only is the NCSC PR
message wrong, it's extremely offensive and this sort of insinuation informally presented before a court of law should be illegal. This is blatant collusion.

Most of these NCSC beams of darkness are not much more than cleverly-cloaked "greed is good" concepts designed to eliminate consumer protections thus erasing the legal responsibilities of the numerous multi-national corporations sponsoring NCSC.

For the benefit of all Americans NCSC is as bogus as their fake seal. They are attempting to modify the U.S. Constitution to reflect the views of their globalist controllers.

A little over a hundred years ago, NCSC would be recognized as a typical band of anarchists attacking the root of democracy, our Constitution and Bill of Rights.

They hate freedom and love dominion. They, as the global anarchists of a century ago attempted to do, seek to establish a centralized world power, their neo-feudal lords.

Fortunately for us living today, a generation or so ago, Theodore Roosevelt sounded the warning, "Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people."

If we recall history, just a handful of years after TR's warning about shadow government, it was anarchists who fired the first shot of the Great War. Undoubtedly Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria was assassinated by globalists.

In America, the scales of justice are symbolically left empty due to the fact that we all agree to equally abide as good citizens, and the court system is impartial. Those elements attempting to destabilize "and justice for all" are un-American.


In NCSC symbolism (left) the scales are anything, but empty. In fact, they're loaded in a most peculiar way. The family is fatherless, the mother has her hands bound behind her back, and one autistic child is sitting down engaged in child's play. Somehow these three are counter-balancing the full weight of three full-grown people, a loaded briefcase, and a cell-phone.

Take a closer look. Notice the horizontal lever fulcrum is shifted to the left. The arched hands at the ends of the lever holding the chains aren't symmetric. The right one is bent under stress, and the ring link holding the bason chains, unlike the left one, looks weak or broken.

The mind might catch the missing father and attempt to compensate, but the subtle conditioning of the scales prevents it. To save justice the scale must tip in favor of "friends of the state courts". Quite a vivid example of doctoring graphic symbolism to throw the state justice system off balance.

But, let's not forget the guided image is designed to trigger thought precession. It's up to the intended observer to step things forward in their subconscious. In this case, it's state-level judges and court employees from across the nation.

Thus, NCSC presents each state the false dichotomy.