Friday, October 31, 2008

Offit's Mouth Is Where His Money Is

"During the last considerable epidemic at the turn of the century, I was a member of the Health Committee of London Borough Council, and I learned how the credit of vaccination is kept up statistically by diagnosing all the revaccinated cases (of smallpox) as pustular eczema, varioloid or what not---except smallpox."---George Bernard Shaw

Best wishes attempting to find out what constituted a placebo during the clinical trials of Paul Offit's vaccine invention. Was his vaccine truly tested against a benign placebo, or was it matched up against a previous failed version of a rotavirus vaccine and caused slightly less iatrogenic damage?

Why wouldn't America like to know what the ingredients of these so called placebos are?

For most Americans it will come as a surprise to learn that very often clinical trials aren't netural versus unknown. It's more like an OK Corral wager situation of the less worse of two bads walks away with bloody hands.

Most likely the reason Dr. Offit's placebo is a medical mystery to the general public is this is just another case where drug companies do something like match a Thimerosal-containing vaccine against a Thimerosal-containing placebo then say there is no evidence of an association of negative neurological outcomes.

The same relates to the reason Congress fails to act in the public interests by requiring further study, and as a result, federal agencies refuse to conduct an Autism study of the vaccinated versus unvaccinated. The federal government can't study vax vs. un-vax because they already know there is no significant rate of Autism among unvaccinated people. If they do officially confirm no Autism in the unvaccinated population it will be the end of mass vaccination policies.

Just how sloppy are FDA-approved vaccine clinical trials? A search of VAERS, vaccine adverse events reporting system, found one 2007 entry for Rotateq vaccine using 'placebo' entered as a symptom. The adverse event took place six years earlier in 2001. It reads:

"It was noted that the patient participated in a clinical trial for Rotateq and was not sure if her daughter received the placebo or the vaccine." "within a week of receiving the vaccine the patient experienced diarrhea on and off." "Medical attention was sought through a physician." "No labs or diagnostic studies were performed." " The patient outcome was not recovered."

The Offit rotavirus vaccine is referred to at VAERS as 'ROTHB5'.

A VAERS search using 'ROTHB5' and 'INTUSSUSCEPTION' as a symptom produced 429 separate adverse events reports. Substituting 'INTUSS' as a symptoms produced 431 separate reports.

Using 'ROTHB5' and including 'SURGICAL' and 'SURGERY' alternately as symptoms produced 248 separate reports. Using 'ROTHB5' and 'DIED?' produced 89 VAERS death reports.

By contrast, a previous rotavirus vaccine marketed by Wyeth(RV)VAERS search produced 156 reports of intussusception and 14 deaths.

Parents can search the VAERS material at:

The Offit vaccine is 'ROTHB5'. There's overwhelming evidence that his vaccine is associated with telescoping bowels (intussusception). Pay close attention to how many cases of intussusception report positive rotavirus lab data.

UPDATE 11/2/08

Adding the following information:

Article Date: 15 Feb 2007

The FDA says it is issuing the notice to remind people that intussusception is a potential complication of the RotaTeq vaccine, and to encourage them to report cases of intussusception so that the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) can assess the risks associated with the vaccine.

They would like US healthcare professionals and others to report any cases of this or other adverse events associated with RotaTeq to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).

If your child has stomach pain, vomiting and diarrhea, there is blood in the child's stool or changes in bowel movements, these could be signs of intussusception and you should tell the doctor straight away.

The FDA says that intussusception can occur spontaneously in the absence of vaccination and they do not know whether any of the 28 reported cases were caused by RotaTeq or just coincidence.

Of the 28 cases reported so far, about half of them occurred within 21 days of vaccination and 16 of the infants had to have surgery. The other children were treated without surgery, using enemas. No deaths were reported.



Wednesday, October 29, 2008

A More Excellent Way

Just read a study that claimed nine hundred serum samples from pregnant women were obtained for testing. It said measles and rubella immunity among the pregnant ladies were 88% and 98%, respectively, and the two immunities did not appear to interfere with each other.

So what about their babies?

If this high level of immunity is consistent among all moms-to-be why is vaccination of their newborn infants still considered to be a necessity?

The public needs to understand that these mommies with big bellies deliver babies, not storks. Immunity to disease is delivered from the mommy to the infant, too.

Mythbusters can try to prove it on their TV show, but even if storks could generate enough lift to carry a baby they wouldn't know where to go because they can't read addresses, and they can't stand while trying to turn the pages of the phone book or holding down a city map in the wind. Plus, somebody would have taken UFO video of them before.

To date, the CDC has nothing to refute that diseases stop in parts of the world before vaccination is ever employed.

While every child deserves to be scientifically screen-tested in order to indicate whether or not each child does, in fact, require something to trick their bodies into becoming sick in order to make them immune for when the real sickness tries to make them sick so they will have a full life of disease immunity, nobody actually clinically proves a vaccine is a medical necessity.

The study establishes that immunity exists in pregnant women A-OK.

This study suggested that vaccinating babies for measles is 88% unnecessary and for mumps is 98% unnecessary.

The study did not prove that pregnant women's immunity, indeed, carries over to their babies, thus protecting them long enough for their immature bodies to develop their own immune system.

The study did not prove that babies these mommies delivered had no immunity, nor did it prove these babies had no ability to fight off a vaccine-induced immune challenge.

If the study did prove these babies had no ability to fight off a vaccine-induced immune challenge such iatrogenic measures would be exposed. Undigested things are not supposed to enter the human body because of what might happen.

So despite the myths propagated by unethical CDC officials and Every Child By Two sadists, we have to believe that everything necessary to prevent most all childhood diseases from affecting infants and toddlers is pre-loaded and on-board at birth.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

To The Mars, Alice!

What is Autism? Autism is a one-million seat rocket carrying American infants and toddlers on a government-funded Every Child By Two field-trip to Mars.

At stardate -331782.21835362754, the launch directors know something is terribly wrong with their rocket. They discover they screwed up and the rocket in flight is going to miss the intended planet so badly that there isn't enough money in the budget to pay for a recovery mission.

They also momentarily consider the cost in human resources. They learn that a single lost of life is a tragedy, but a million losses of life is just statistics. They hold bullet meetings all over the place and quickly detach themselves as a means of self-preservation.

As snowballs are known to grow, rather than inform the parents of this tragedy, essentially the entire launch operation has bolted the doors and not allowed anyone in or out. They reassure themselves that they are the experts and vaunt in front of each other approvingly at their secret public meetings held behind closed doors.
To spare themselves of an emotional bad day they are told to cut off all communications with their rocket. The unsuspecting children are left entirely abandoned hurtling through space.

Most of the mothers and fathers have that internal instinct that tells them the silence means something is wrong.

At first, the parents gathering at the launch site by the seashore are united, courteously waiting for some word. Only problem is the launch directors have avowed to never disclose, not a thing. They convince the media to embargo the entire story, and hire PR specialists to do the rest.
Many parents can't deal with reality. They convince themselves that "no word" from ground control means nothing is wrong. They can't see the rocket and accept their star-voyagers are all well.
Others hear talk, but decide to accept the loss of their children trusting that at least future space field trip rules will be written in the blood of their children.

Some parents look around and discover they are well-equipped and well-connected enough to handle things. They slip away from the crowd and start packing for just another road trip.

Then there are those parents who refuse to accept this failure. These Parents of La Mancha can not accept life as it is. They burn in their hearts to make things as it should be. They have all the heart to do battle with all the dragons, but their hearts are really broken. Their faith among faithlessness forces them to rip their broken hearts out for all the world to see too often and they burn out a lot.
They want people to see their love and devotion. They hope that putting a face on the tragedy will change things for others.

Another group of parents sell the house and try to swim to Mars. They've seen other parents have rescued their kids, but they don't have much to say and certainly just want to put it all behind them. Those willing to swim to Mars learn you gotta have a rocket. It takes money to make it to Mars and back. Their recovery plan requires ground control to admit their mistake and pay them compensation.

Ground control smiles because they know the point of no return. The statute miles of limitations are logging away. The bottom-feeders are brought in to clean them up.

After a while, the launch directors assess their risk management works A-OK, they've got paying sponsors and lots of rockets to fire, so they announce that more field-trips will be launched.

That's Autism.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Don't Kid Yourself...McCain Is Our A-Man

Don't kid yourself, only one presidential candidate spoke about Autism during last night's debate. After that, the other guy listened to the voice in his ear, twitched in his right eye, then responded to the issue in terms of making a ice cold point about a stated policy which would be in conflict.

This is what was said during the third and final debate.

JOHN MCCAIN said this: "She'll be my partner. She (Palin) understands reform. And, by the way, she also understands special-needs families. She understands that autism is on the rise, that we've got to find out what's causing it, and we've got to reach out to these families, and help them, and give them the help they need as they raise these very special needs children."

BARAK OBAMA said this: "I do want to just point out that autism, for example, or other special needs will require some additional funding, if we're going to get serious in terms of research. That is something that every family that advocates on behalf of disabled children talk about."

JOHN MCCAIN then said this: "But again, I want to come back to, notice every time Senator Obama says, "We need to spend more, we need to spend more, that's the answer" -- why do we always have to spend more? Why can't we have transparency, accountability, reform of these agencies of government? Maybe that's why he's asked for 860 -- sought and proposed $860 billion worth of new spending and wants to raise people's taxes in a time of incredible challenge and difficulty and heartache for the American families.

JOHN MCCAIN continued, later saying "And I just said to you earlier, town hall meeting after town hall meeting, parents come with kids, children -- precious children who have autism. Sarah Palin knows about that better than most. And we'll find and we'll spend the money, research, to find the cause of autism. And we'll care for these young children. And all Americans will open their wallets and their hearts to do so."

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

How Do You Boycott Denis Leary?

Our Autism house is still swirling in confusion after the sui generis comments of Denis Leary.

People say things that need to be said. People say important things that need to be said over and over.

As the father of an Autistic child, I can say that what was said by Denis Leary about Autism is a big mess. It's Denis Leary's big mess. He said what he thought needed to be said, and he said it. It's a big mess.

Does what Denis Leary has said about Autism bother me? Not really. It's a free country, at least some parts of it are still free, so he can say what he wants. We can say is what he said is something he said.

My opinion of his remarks is this: Denis, you make absolutely no sense at all. If your intentions were to stir up a fight, don't worry there's nothing in there about Autism in what you said worthy of a boycott.

What remains to be said is sometimes the media really needs to show some self-respect. That means to qualify the value of what people say and not be afraid to leave something out when what was said makes absolutely no sense at all.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Simpsonwood Minute

The Simpsonwood transcripts tell the story health officials will never tell publicly. The excerpts speak of collusion, obfuscation, and deceit between government agencies and vaccine industry officials. The translation is provided to the reader in order to make the high-brow discourse more intelligible, more human.

Dr. Vito Caserta - Chief Medical Officer for theVaccine Injury Compensation Program "I have a question for Bob. When you did the chart review, Bob, did you look at the zero group to see if there was any obvious difference with that group as opposed to the rest of the cohort, or was that not done? Can you describe the zero group in any other way other than saying that there is a zero group and that's all I know about them, and that they had two polios?"

ONE TRANSLATION: You can not be serious! Are you nuts? Tell me that you didn't actually look to see if the charts reflect zero Thimerosal exposure equals no Autism. None of us care that zero Thimerosal exposure means a no Autism outcome. The only thing we care about is that zero Thimerosal exposure means no vaccinations. It really doesn't matter if we say they had two polio vaccines. Polio vaccine has been around long enough for the public to know it doesn't cause Autism.

Dr. Bob Davis - Associate Professor of Pediatrics and Epidemiology at the University of Washington.
"No, we did the chart review completely separate from exposure. We literally had no idea what the exposure was on purpose and I provided the chart review. Your point is well taken."

ONE TRANSLATION: Dude, relax. We didn't even evaluate Thimerosal exposure when we pulled individual charts. We have no idea it was the Thimerosal on purpose. Do you think I'm gonna actually look at charts to implicate vaccines cause Autism? I don't see it if I don't look, right?

Dr. Tom Clarkson - from an area of frozen tundra in Rochester, New York. "Mr. Chairman, when I look at the paper here, the graphs don't always say zero. The reference. They say less than 37.5, then say less than 25, so are they all referred to zero or not?"

ONE TRANSLATION: I don't like these guys so I'm telling. Mr. Chairman something is screwy with their numbers. They've got the zero exposures thrown in with "less than 37.5" then here with "less than 25". Am I supposed to believe this? Zero Thimerosal exposure is separate, right?

Dr. M. Miles Braun - Director of the Divison of Epidemiology, Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology , Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US FDA "No, but even in those less than 35, they are part of the less than 35 group. I mean they could be excluded from that."

ONE TRANSLATION: No, but don't get upset and throw up about it. Look, just because you noticed that they threw in a bunch of zero exposures to dilute data doesn't mean anybody else will. Try to see the bright side of deception, zero is technically less than 35. Remember the zero group is a bunch of normal kids. Sure, we can take them out of the less than 35, but we're screwed if we do. And you don't want that, do you?

Dr. Bob Chen - Chief of Vaccine Safety and Development at the National Immunization Program at CDC "I think the bottom line is that while the zero group is different, and I think all of us would agree with that, the issue is that it is impossible, unethical to leave kids unimmunized, so you will never, ever resolve that issue...If we can never, ever leave kids unimmunized through these age groups in order to study them ideally as we would like, then of the kids who did become or are left unimmunized for whatever reason, be it that their parents are socially responsible or be it that they have some other pre-existing condition medically, we just have to work with that. If these kids are otherwise normal and they really are just not being immunized because of social circumstances probably, we need to make some judgment as to are they otherwise at risk for the outcomes that we are looking at."

ONE TRANSLATION: So you busted us? Big deal? We all know ethylmercury is a neurotoxin. Who cares if what we've done here is crooked? We're vaccinologists, damn it. We lie for a living. So start lying! So, the unvaccinated don't have detectable levels of Autism. Sure. We've got a few things working in our favor. Look at the positives. The public is brain-washed into accepting mass vaccination. Today we are powerful enough to throw parents in jail for not vaccinating. They'll never go along with the idea of people not vaccinating their children because we've got them living in constant fear. If people with vaccine-induced autistic children fight us, we can blame them for the lack of vaccine protection. We can work with the idea that their children are screwing up everything for everybody else. We can say anything we want and the public will believe us. Look at our titles. We'll have no trouble coming up with a way to spin this.

Dr. Vito Caserta - Chief Medical Officer for theVaccine Injury Compensation Program

"But Bob, a study could be done. You could use the acellular pertussis that doesn't have Thimerosal in ComVax, and have children be immunized, but not have any Thimerosal."

ONE TRANSLATION: I'm the chief medical officer for vaccine court and I'm sitting here telling you how to rig a study designed to exonerate vaccines from causing Autism. I totally ignore what's happened to these children and intend to help you cover it up. People won't know the version in the study isn't a Thimerosal-containing vaccine. They'll just read Hep B vaccine and think it's the Thimerosal-loaded one. Heck, that will save the entire vaccine program!

The Pretending to Combat Autism Act

By Bernard Rimland
Dr. Bernard Rimland was the founder and director of the Autism Research Institute. He passed away in November 2006

I strongly oppose endorsing "The (Pretending to) Combat Autism Act" unless it includes clear and explicit language supporting meaningful research on the role of vaccines and mercury as plausible causes of the autism epidemic.

The proposed Combating Autism legislation is as sincerely dedicated to combating autism as O.J. Simpson was to finding the "real killers" of his ex-wife Nicole.

The fear that failure to pass the CAA will lead to a catastrophic failure to fund future autism research vastly overestimates the value of government funded research. Most such research is only of academic interest, which gathers dust on library shelves and advances the "publish or perish" aspirations of academic researchers. Is there any evidence whatever that more than a miniscule percent of government funded research has produced any positive and useful benefits for autistic children and their families, or ever will? If you are aware of any examples showing such research is serving a truly useful purpose, please let me know.

I was the first to announce the "autism epidemic", in 1995, and I pointed out in that article that excessive vaccines were a plausible cause of the epidemic. As you know, an enormous amount of clinical laboratory research (as opposed to epidemiological research), has been accumulated since that time, supporting my position. (I did not know then that the vaccines contained mercury, although I had been collecting data since 1967 from the mothers of autistic children, on any dental work they may have had during their pregnancy.)

The evidence is now overwhelming, despite the misinformation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Institute of Medicine. Real progress has been made in bringing recovery to autistic children by physicians and researchers who attend the autism/vaccine/mercury connection.

A few million dollars, appropriately directed, has accomplished, and will continue to accomplish much more than the tens of millions of dollars directed along paths intended to exonerate the vaccine manufacturers, the CDC, the IOM and the AAP.

I hope our consortium will purchase, or at least threaten to purchase ads in USA Today an elsewhere saying "Defeat the (Pretend to) Combat Autism Act". We should insist that significant resources be directed at exploiting the treatments that we know work, such as special diets, food supplements and chelation. We have a great deal to gain and nothing to lose by speaking out loudly against this sham legislation which would, in the long run, be harmful rather than beneficial to our children.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Flu Season Follies: CDC Cans Fear...again

Is there a chance now that Americans are beginning to question some of the sour influenza bunk public health officials have been feeding Americans each year? No. That's why this video was recently smuggled in past US Customs agents directly from the CBC. (Canadian Broadcasting Company)

People might recall 'The Big Whiff' of 2003? That year the statistics failed to support the health claims that flu shot works by protecting people against the flu. The US CDC was forced to admit the flu shot offered 0% protection. Think the reason was related to disease mutation of some other futuristic alteration of the universe?

Wrong. The proclaimed experts were forced to admit they got the wrong strain of influenza. But any flu strain is supposed to trigger an antibody response. That's why we're supposed to trust public authorities. That's 0% protection against the flu and lots of bio hazardous waste.

The 2004 flu vaccine was cancelled due to serratia bacteria contamination. The US supply was not halted for our protection by the US FDA, but rather the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. Serratia is a serious lung bacteria which causes pneumonia and renal infections.

US FDA documents indicated that the plant was visited in 2003, but no action was taken. Sounds like a harmless situation easily covered by spray cleaner and a roll of paper towels? Wrong. Just to make sure American flu vaccine marketeers understood the severity of the serratia contamination problems, the MHRA revoked the Liverpool plant's flu vaccine license preventing them from making any more product until the plant was disinfected.

National Institutes of Health researchers did a clinical study of the flu shot and concluded that it does NOT save lives. They reported there had been no change in influenza-related mortality in the elderly during the years 1980 to 2001, despite a greater than fourfold increase in vaccine coverage!

The US CDC was extremely disgraced by creating the bird flu scare. Among the reasons? Scientists at Seoul National University in South Korea fed an extract of kimchi, a spicy Korean variant of sauerkraut, to 13 chickens infected with avian flu, and a week later, 11 of the birds started to recover.

And finally, another great disgrace was a British Medical Journal article written by Harvard grad student Peter Doshi. He pointed out that the CDC states that the historic 1968-9 'Hong Kong flu' pandemic killed 34 000 Americans. At the same time, CDC claims 36 000 Americans annually die from flu. Doshi asked, "What is going on?"

Americans should know that uptake of flu shots is not benign.

Flu shot left executive paralyzed

Flu Shots and Alzheimer's Disease

Saturday, October 11, 2008

Evil People Are Sowing Tares

Precession means step forward. The ancient Greek astronomers discovered that the exact spot where the sun crosses the equator changes by about a foot further to the west each year. This is known as the precession of the equinoxes, or just precession.

Very often a woman's preparation for bathing includes sensuously raising her hair up away from her body.

Bath or Shower hair, whatever you want to call it, is often used in print media and in active-motion media as a means to instantly create intimacy between the observer and the subject.

PR imaging tactics are employed suggestively to trigger thought precession. Thought precession relates to the art of designing mass media so that it triggers the desired thought precession in individuals. It's typically a still photo or graphic because the mind catches up quickly and then takes the next step forward.

If done right the mind will not catch the method of conceptualization, but will react favorable based on what the PR target objective is at some point in time later on.

Graphics do this, too.

The National Center for State Courts, a big business propaganda machine, uses
guided imagery to trigger thought precession of state court officials . NCSC spews toxic, un-American ideas.

Not only is the NCSC PR
message wrong, it's extremely offensive and this sort of insinuation informally presented before a court of law should be illegal. This is blatant collusion.

Most of these NCSC beams of darkness are not much more than cleverly-cloaked "greed is good" concepts designed to eliminate consumer protections thus erasing the legal responsibilities of the numerous multi-national corporations sponsoring NCSC.

For the benefit of all Americans NCSC is as bogus as their fake seal. They are attempting to modify the U.S. Constitution to reflect the views of their globalist controllers.

A little over a hundred years ago, NCSC would be recognized as a typical band of anarchists attacking the root of democracy, our Constitution and Bill of Rights.

They hate freedom and love dominion. They, as the global anarchists of a century ago attempted to do, seek to establish a centralized world power, their neo-feudal lords.

Fortunately for us living today, a generation or so ago, Theodore Roosevelt sounded the warning, "Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people."

If we recall history, just a handful of years after TR's warning about shadow government, it was anarchists who fired the first shot of the Great War. Undoubtedly Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria was assassinated by globalists.

In America, the scales of justice are symbolically left empty due to the fact that we all agree to equally abide as good citizens, and the court system is impartial. Those elements attempting to destabilize "and justice for all" are un-American.

In NCSC symbolism (left) the scales are anything, but empty. In fact, they're loaded in a most peculiar way. The family is fatherless, the mother has her hands bound behind her back, and one autistic child is sitting down engaged in child's play. Somehow these three are counter-balancing the full weight of three full-grown people, a loaded briefcase, and a cell-phone.

Take a closer look. Notice the horizontal lever fulcrum is shifted to the left. The arched hands at the ends of the lever holding the chains aren't symmetric. The right one is bent under stress, and the ring link holding the bason chains, unlike the left one, looks weak or broken.

The mind might catch the missing father and attempt to compensate, but the subtle conditioning of the scales prevents it. To save justice the scale must tip in favor of "friends of the state courts". Quite a vivid example of doctoring graphic symbolism to throw the state justice system off balance.

But, let's not forget the guided image is designed to trigger thought precession. It's up to the intended observer to step things forward in their subconscious. In this case, it's state-level judges and court employees from across the nation.

Thus, NCSC presents each state the false dichotomy.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Something Is Causing More Infant Deaths

In 1928, 67.9 deaths of American children under the age of one occurred for every 1000 live births. Over decades the mortality rate continued to drop and drop and drop.

In 1940, the US infant mortality rate had fallen to 47 deaths before age one for every 1000 live births. In 1960 the rate was 26. In 1980 it fell to 12.5.

Low infant mortality has always been a matter of pride for most all countries on earth because it's probably the best way to measure the over-all quality of life.

Vaccine court was invented in 1986. Since then, if an American infant or toddler is vaccine injured or vaccine killed the family is sent to VICP to be compensated.

In the early 1990s, right about the time Rosie Carter and Betty Bumpers created the "Every Child By Two" vaccine cabal and Hillary Clinton coordinated the establishment of the federal vaccination gestapo, both pushing more doses of vaccines that had Thimerosal in them, Autism rates began to climb.
Perhaps it's just possible that these have had something to do with the fact that the infant mortality rate began to stop declining. After all, the United States is currently ranked 41st lowest in infant mortality rates. 40 countries have lower rates.

The Simpsonwood Transcripts relate to the 2000 secret "off government property" meeting of vaccine crisis managers. There in Simpsonwood, Georgia gathered the bunch of them to review Tom Verstraeten's Vaccine Safety Datalink study.

From the transcripts we learn very early in the meeting that most of the superstar members of the panel were crabby about a particular vaccine, the Hepatitis B.

Anway, it was supposed to be a two-phase study of adverse negative neurological outcomes and their relationship to Thimerosal vaccine exposure leading to Autism diagnosis. Phase one of the study would be VSD data that related to medical insurance company computer coding records. Phase two would be chart review of the actual medical records.

Along the way the Verstraeten people discovered a problem with including the chart review idea.

"Hepatitis B tends to be a bit low, and I think that primarily is because of capturing the birth dose. The hospital's HMO birth dose some times didn't tend to get into the data bases as well in the early years," said Frank DeStefano, M.D..

What this possibly means, of course, is the medical records were wiped clean of adverse reactions caused by the Hepatitis B vaccine, but discovering that records of Hepatitis B vaccine birth dose uptake should have been in the medical records of new born children...being smart doctors they would abidingly not do phase two of the Thimerosal study because somebody outside the secret meeting would notice.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

2004: Influenza Shot Fiasco

The 2004 flu season was supposed to re-introduce Thimerosal-containing vaccines to the infant and toddler CDC-mandated schedule.

Most all wondered why the government/vaccine industry alliance, which had made a decision to slowly reduce Thimerosal from vaccines in 1999, was now recommending putting it back with such a head-knocking cymbal crash.

The Thimerosal ban movement working at the state level found the reason very quickly.

Not only did the actions of the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices return completely unnecessary ethylmercury exposures to the tiny bodies of American infants and toddlers, and pregnant women, the addition of influenza vaccine to the schedule for the first time ever assured that there weren't enough child-size Thimerosal-free flu shots to go around nationally. This was especially true since not one, but two flu shots were mandated for every American child.

The vaccine market convinced many states to not enact mercury bans based on the idea that children wouldn't get their flu shots if laws required only Thimerosal-free. Strange considering they had full knowledge that in their international markets Thimerosal-free vaccines had been in use for decades. Russia removed mercury from vaccines in the 1970s. Sweden did so in 1991. Yet to amplify this as a no-ban example, the alliance created the new flu shot requirement fully knowing that they lacked quantities of the Thimerosal-free jabs.

What policy makers missed entirely was the entire flu shot recommendation was idiotic. It made no sense at all considering that in 2003 we were eye-witnessing the worse possible influenza vaccine failure. The shot was having serious issues across the country.

People got the shot and got sick directly after. Some died.

Despite world record uptake and nonsense efforts to "debunk the flu shot myth" that it causes cases of flu, the CDC was forced to admit the shot offered zero percent protection against flu. Some called 2003's flu shot "The Big Whiff". Other views included flu experts shot themselves in the foot by picking the wrong influenza strain...again.

As typical, the failures of 2003 rolled right off the backs of the vaccine industry. Marketing plans, media saturation, and a jolly order of Thimerosal-containing flu shots was made. Around town even the kiosks were in place complete with the hand-written"Flu Shots next Tuesday" signs and posters.

Serratia bacteria cause renal infections and pneumonia in humans. This type of bacteria was used in U.S. germ warfare experiments in the 1950s. During "Operation SeaSpray" naval vessels spewed serratia into the air from their decks while puttering around twelve miles off the coast of San Francisco. Area hospitals saw an outbreak of pneumonia cases. A report of the outbreak was filed, but intercepted, apparently by CIA. At least one died as a result of the experimentation.

In 2004, the vaccine plant in Liverpool,
England charged with manufacturing the U.S. flu shot was infested with serratia contamination. US FDA documents from 2003 indicate that inspectors were aware of the contamination, but did nothing.

UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency did do something. Not only did they stop the tainted flu supply, but to make sure FDA regulators, attempting to by-pass their safety call, accepted the gravity of the contamination problems the MHRA lifted the plant's license which prohibited them from producing any influenza vaccines until they cleaned up the big mess.

Interesting to note, the 2004 confiscated flu shot shipment was Thimerosal-containing.

Saturday, October 4, 2008

Mr. John Q. Public's New Clothes

"Edward Bernays was the first person to take Freud's ideas about human beings and use them to manipulate the masses. He showed American corporations for the first time how they could make people want things that they didn't need by linking mass-produced goods to their unconscious desires. Out of this would come a new political idea about how to control the masses. By satisfying people's inner, selfish desires one made them happy and thus docile. It was the start of the all-consuming self which has come to dominate our world today." - The Century of Self part one

The Wall Street media package which led to the $850,000,000,000.00 give-away isn't a surprise to Thimerosal families. Hey, we've been fighting city hall all by ourselves for many years. Just a year or two back, we saw the same sort of government affairs bunko racket swindle $1 billion dollars in the name of Autism.

Don't preach to us about bribes, loose regulations, and no accountability. We've got all that profusely pouring out of our nostrils. $7.1 billion dollars for a bird flu vaccine that one drug company admitted they already had and new legal loopholes created to protect the "bio-terrorism countermeasures" market from any product liability. And not a second's worth of debate ever took place in Congress.

To acknowledge greed and corruption is the root of America's problems is one thing, but to actually find a politician willing to receive a bullet in the back of the head for what's right is another.

It takes moral character and daring to hold the American people in high enough esteem to put an end to white collar welfare racketeering.

Charities are nothing more than the rich man's entitlement and a nice way for politicians to launder the money they cheat and steal. Corporate heads run the charities to dodge taxes and write themselves welfare checks. The humanitarian profiteers are no better than Somali war lords swiping a pallet of corn sacks from hungry villagers.

Sure the corporations cheat. Sure they bribe public officials. Sure they rob from the poor, needy, and disabled and give to the rich. Sure they speak despitefully of the average American citizen.

Lesson number one is Congress and corporations laugh together because they are inseparable. Like gang and ster.

What you get for you tax dollar is a generic web site to spam and the phone number answered by a staffer. You simply can't compete with a corporation cabal that has money to burn in "governmental affairs re-investments". The drug lobby has so much money that there's eight lobbyists for every single member of Congress.

The only positives that will come out the $850B Wall Street looting is perhaps more Americans will wake up to the fact that life as a constantly moving happiness machine is empty, corporations control our lives, and the American spirit is a dead lead.

The corporatists know whatever your beef is with Congress, you'll give up. You simply don't have the time or the money that they have.

Thursday, October 2, 2008

A Snake In The "GRAS"

Or Snake People visit The "Baghdad Bob" School of Vaccine Research

Poisoning the placebo to achieve balance in negative neurological outcomes is wrong.

Is that right? Thimerosal-containing vaccines being profiled for uptake safety against Thimerosal-containing placebos?

No way! Why would they put Thimerosal in vaccine placebos? It makes no sense unless you deliberately were doing it to make Thimerosal-containing vaccine damage go away. How do you expect to detect problems with Thimerosal if both contain the mercury? The negative neurological outcomes are a wash if both the vaccine and the placebo contain mercury.

Webster's defines placebo as "an inert or innocuous substance used especially in controlled experiments testing the efficacy of another substance". Placebo comes from Latin meaning "I shall please". Yeah, but who?

Thimerosal is not Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) or Generally Recognized As Effective (GRAE). Contrary to popular deception, mercury is still in vaccines. They're just telling you it's not. Now add Thimerosal-containing placebos to the toxic vaccine mess.

When Autism rates exploded beginning in the early 1990s, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration discovered that they had no safe exposure level for ethylmercury. They had never evaluated it at various injection concentrations. They instead switched to numbers relating to tuna mercury.

According to popular yarns, lore, Bob Bazell, myth, Nancy Synderman, mythology, tradition, Dr. Timothy Johnson, anecdote, fable, folktale, old wives' tale, Brian Williams, tale, yarn, the body of customs, beliefs, stories, and just about every vaccinologist, and preservative republican associated with the FOX NEWS channel Thimerosal was supposed to have been taken out of vaccines in 1999.

Not really. It's still in the vaccines. Read the package inserts.

And what say you about Thimerosal being prominently present in placebos used to evaluate prophylactics? Don't ask FDA to check it out. They lost the first citizen's petition calling on them to prove the safety of Thimerosal and bawked at a second, claiming that it was a complicated issue.

Sure if everything you've got as far as vaccine safety is backed up by placebos with Thimerosal in them.

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Wall Street Speaks

You can't make this stuff up. The Wall Street bailout is now in the hands of the Senate. That can't be good for America, can it?In a stupid attempt to gain allies, the gang at Wall Street Speaks has slipped in a toxic sugar cube.

This from the tail-end of a Yahoo

"Other provisions added by the Senate include a measure to require large companies' health plans to give equal treatment to mental health or addiction if they cover such illnesses. The House and Senate have passed similar "mental health parity" measures, but none has gone to Bush for his signature."

A few years ago, the Autism NPO sharks pushed the Combating Autistics Act through to passage. In doing so they exchanged vital Thimerosal and vaccine research for $1 billion dollar's worth of pocket money for Autism NPO sharks. Any surprise?

Wall Street Speaks apparently is now betting on the idea that sectors of this community have sold out before and they'll do it again.

What does real mercury research look like? Click this:

Even if it's just the skin of the truth, the fact that the Senate is willing to toss in mental health "mandates" relates to the concept of dumping Autistic children and other neurological disabilities into the insurance industry meat-grinder to help pay Wall Street Speaks is telling.

Similar insurance mandates, pushed by GE vice-chairman Bob Wright through his Autism Speaks chairity operation, were dropped on states earlier this year leading to ineffectual laws that do little more than cap insurance industry costs.

The specific Autism coverage
bills sanctioned by Bob Wright are age-discriminatory, provide loopholes to navigate around prevalence figures, and lay the groundwork for an experimental Autism pill in development by Autism Speaks co-factor Neuropharm.

Legislative leaders have been under inappropriate pressure from the Bush White House before and as a result have done things similar.

For example, a liability protection rider benefiting Eli Lilly was inserted into the Homeland Security Act of 2003. The rider gave the pharmaceutical giant protection against lawsuits relating to autistic-like neurological damage caused by Thimerosal.

Most all on Capitol Hill had no idea the rider was added until somebody flipped to the tail-end of the Homeland Security Act and found it.

The bill's passage was held up in the Senate as outrage over the Eli Lilly rider spread. However, thanks to a media dumb-down of the HSA, calls to remove the gift fell on deaf ears.

After Senate Majority leader Trent Lott agreed to "revisit" some provision of the HSA act in the new year, he was creamed by the media for
something he said about Strom Thurmond at a party dinner.

Though Lott profusely apologized, thanks to an effort to remove him from leadership spear-headed by Al Gore , doctor
Bill Frist
of Columbia Healthcare fortune seized control of the majority leadership.

Frist failed to defend the Lilly rider's existence as members of Congress and parents fought back against the preservative republicans.

The rider was repealed in January of 2003 ending a struggle that shocked many American families. Senator Patrick Leahy had this remark for the three republicans who were instrumental in the repeal:

“Senators Snowe, Chafee and Collins have done right by the families whose rights were taken away last fall in the homeland security bill. The Eli Lilly rider that was slipped into the bill is a travesty against these parents and their children..."

How can something like the Eli Lilly rider happen? Why not give a listen to this interview of a former Eli Lilly executive to find the answer?

Then ponder the fact that experimental drugs like the nex-gen SSRI "Autism pill" developed by Bob Wright and Neuropharm already have liability protection, but no compensation plan funding.

Not only does Wall Street Speaks speak, but they also have a pill solution for the Autism epidemic to make money on.