Friday, December 26, 2008

CAA II: Total Bul...


The trouble today is most people refuse to sweat things out. Any...






The same hedge-fund creamers who falsely drilled Texas Rep. Joe...






Millions of dollars in NPO shark salaries and not a page of Thim...






The late Dr. Bernard Rimland called it the "Pretending to Comba...






Any ASD research money goes directly into their pockets. You ca...






As moms and dads expose these crooks they simply move on to new...

Thursday, December 18, 2008

BOHICA All Over Again!

Gee, before you become engaged in lobbying activities don't you think it's a good idea of asking what this is all about? Or are you so self-interested and self-promoting that you really believe everything you participate in totally rocks?

Lately, it sounds like a few self-appointed Autism lobbyists aren't exactly fired up about their prospective bed-fellows. CLICK

Of course, as with the bogus Combating Autistics Act passage, by the time it becomes visible it's already too late. You can't flatten the tire on a steam-roller, can you? It hasn't got any.

The queer part of the article is the author (from Illinois) knew about this bill BEFORE the election ever took place and said nothing until now. A sure sign of someone least likely to have anything other than personal interests at heart. It's also a given that the purpose of writing the article was to exhibit some sort of twisted Marxist dialectic power attempting to belittle any parent wise enough to not go a-whoring with them.

Maybe if your kid is really recovered from ASD you should just buzz off or at least mind your own business now?

Bottom line: Any parent of an autistic kid already knows you can't legislate treatment decisions. Those decisions don't require an Act of Congress. Any parent of an autistic kid also knows what works for one child doesn't necessarily work for another.

Well, come to think about it...Well, gee....the likelihood of that is....

One strong suggestion is these self-promoters might try donning a paper bag?

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Americans Aren't Suckers

There is a common thread between the pediatrician and the serial killer. Both have the ability to disassociate themselves with their victims and they can pretend to not know what they've done when the truth confronts them.

Pediatricians all know what to do when vaccines they inject kill and damage. They also know what they are supposed to do by law, but don't.

Doesn't matter how many American infants and toddlers are killed by vaccination. Doesn't matter how many American children are robbed of their mental capacity by vaccination. As long as the pediatrician keeps their mouth shut they'll never get caught.

Pediatricians must have a thing about mirrors. That's obvious since they seem to be the only ones unable to see the eternal Lady Macbeth kind of guilt written on their foreheads.

Yet, it's not like a dark cloud blew in over America and syringes of Thimerosal-containing vaccines started raining down on infants and toddlers. While it's typical that the vaccines came like rain and the Autism sprouted up sometime after, it's merely foolish to suggest pre-epidemic efforts to create liability preemption weren't premeditated for no apparent reason other than soreness or redness.

Other parts of the world were removing Thimerosal from vaccines not long before the proliferation of vaccines in America began. They knew what to expect when the vaccine industrial complex morphed into the killer disease cabalism which universally stokes public perception that we're all gonna die if we don't buy and inject some kind of biological crap.

That's why vaccine lots are busted up. That's why they created Thimerosal-containing placebos. That's why Thimerosal is still in many infant and toddler shots. That's why the vaccine industrial complex is telling America the mercury is out when it really isn't.

The bitter hatred and prejudice toward parents of vaccine-injured children has nothing to do with unfortunate, innocent circumstances. It's more like apprehension drug dealers get every time they hear a nightly news mention something like "the Taliban have crept back into Afghanistan".

"Don't mess with their jack", they say. "You have to lie and say you're pro-vaccine or they won't even listen to you."

Lying publicly to win a seat at a table is not only foolishly wrong, but it has not helped any vaccine-injured child one bit. It never will. In fact, accommodating the vaccine industrial complex with lies has hurt countless other children which is twice as bad as actually being pro-vaccine.

America is listening, but they are smart enough to see the outcrop of tares the vaccine industrial complex has sown amongst the truth.

America does not reject parents of vaccine-injured children. There's just too many kids. America is rejecting the bogus people who have witnessed their own child's regression into Autism and still claim to support mass vaccination.

Monday, December 8, 2008

Only To Find They Laughed In Spite

When somebody saw something they didn't like to see, they said something. This got somebody else to say what they thought needed to be said in order to force the revisionism they desired.

As a result, in response, somebody else did what really didn't need to be done. They deliberately changed things to obfuscate the innocent truth and avoid further perception.

You want to know something? Mainline revisionism has been the most bogus part of the Thimerosal issue.

One day, a piece of information says one thing, then the next it gets changed just because somebody noticed it said what it said.


You sit there at the computer checking your facts, and watch these people alter stuff after the fact. It goes beyond taking the fifth, it goes to take the stupid.

Revisionism like this is crazy mostly because the dopes don't comprehend people have already got five inch stacks of information printed up, including the pre-revisionism versions of what was said.

If you want to be smart, the old advice is you have to stay on your toes because people like to drop the other guy's pants in public to force them to stow away the truth!

Well, when somebody said what they thought needed to be said in order to "out" the other guy, somebody else captured what needed to be captured figuring that the "outing" of what was originally said would end up in the media which would then lead to the revisionism and/or redaction.

It did lead to the revisionism, but by capturing the changes, it makes the fact that their revisions/redactions to mainline information are not going to mean much when things are reconciled later on.
The scary part is the loss of scientific reality. Just because somebody felt uncomfortable about the information as it was, they tattled and got it changed.

Rather than say something about the immature, sophomoric, "high school for money" people and their disastrous, trail of polluted methods which are almost always regressing the issue to a gunslinger publicity stunt level, think about how forcing things like this revisionism/redaction affects future lives.

How many systematic after-vaccination events will now not get reported because somebody does not have complete information?


Who knows?