With the full staff of the federal Department of Justice and all the voyeuristic electronic gizmos and spooks in the back room at their disposal a completely graceless and totally inconsiderate rending of opinion was finally released to the public in what seems a full decade after vaccine injuries to three former infants occurred.
In fact, the opinion apparently omits nearly any mention of ethyl-mercury and it's causal relationship in neuro-degenerative disorder which is established science available in chemistry textbooks.
It is not the fault nor the responsibility of American mothers and fathers to present a safe exposure standard for ethyl-mercury, the form of mercurial compound found in Thimerosal. Such a standard is pure science and certainly establishes causation in part. And in the ten years since the federal government confessed that there is no such thing as a safe exposure level for ethyl-mercury, two separate FDA citizen's petitions requiring the agency to prove the safety of the mercurial have inexplicably been "lost" and little or no progress has ever been made toward anything in terms of an exposure number.
The federal arbitrator makes no mention of this in his opinion rendering, yet it is certainly a basic concern still undressed right down to the certainly finite sub-nanomolar level. Nor did the federal arbitrator at any time accept scientific research which determined in the 1970s that Thimerosal was found to NOT be generally recognized as safe or generally recognized as effective.
The court opinion in the Cedillo case, which does not actually appear to be written by the same man who spoke assuring words to our families in public regarding his compassion, tenderness and understanding, clearly does not attempt to logically or scientifically address anything closely related to causation, but rather stands as a testament to how screwed up and how poorly prepared the vaccine industrial complex was to handle this much vaccine injury and how much power over the American justice system the vaccine industry has.
Rather than any sort of cooperative instrument the opinion rending painted a loving mother as a pathological liar and her child's long distance medical team as bogus goods. It's completely barren that the federal arbitrator isn't aware that with time the human memory of events deteriorates. No doubt even more so when the human mind is trying so desperately to block out such a horrific event as a mother's child melting away into Autism right before her eyes.
Perhaps the federal arbitrator is devoid of understanding the thankless hours of work the mother of and ASD child. It's been said that raising an autistic child is ten times as difficult as a non-effected child. It is therefore not necessarily appropriate to have unreasonable high expectations for her to have even a moment's time to reflect and compose herself. The federal arbitrator has no idea of the physical and mental fatigue involved either.
Causation or no causation based on the ability of a grieving mother to spew out the exact details ten years after is just wrong and reflects terribly on the entire scientific community lynch mob assigned to abuse vaccine injury victims and their families.In seizing upon this for the opinion rendering, not only does it genuinely suggest the years and years of waiting were deliberately employed as a fog of war tactic, as many suggested would be the case, and the federal arbitrator apparently fails to accept his own personal responsibility to abide by something near a fairness doctrine including timeliness.
The fact that the federal arbitrator apparently has no idea what an extremely difficult and trying event even a simple visit to a pediatrician's office can be for our children it seems that the entire opinion was based on witness assassination initiated by the bench itself.
ASD children can and do have a large problem with transitioning. Frankly, with all the federal agents lurking is internet ASD support groups, and in all this time filled with government-sanctioned awareness, it's inexcusable for a federal arbitrator to have never heard of a total melt down and given no consideration to it's negative effect.
It is not extraordinary with our children that during transitions from a house to a doctor's office melt downs do happen. A federal arbitrator must have enough sensitivity training to know issues involving pouting, kicking, screaming, pinching, scratching, thrashing like a man on fire on the floor of the waiting room can make communication virtually impossible and can nullify a parent's entire chain of thoughts let alone completely crumple their nerves.
Mistakes in medical history are bound to happen too when doctor after doctor ignorantly or perhaps deliberately at the beckon of federal authorities asks the same battery of quiz question after quiz question once they suspect a child's been vaccine injured. Parents come to pediatricians for answers not questions.
Another point, Cervantes once said, "one doesn't speak of a noose in the house of the freshly hanged." Yet the federal arbitrator stated clearly that he put trust in terms of causation in the hands of the least likely individuals to acknowledge vaccine injury, pediatricians. It is not uncommon in the world of a vaccine-injured child for their parents to be stone-walled by the very pediatricians vaccinating as part of their business. Families reporting having to go through four or more different pediatricians before finding one willing to initially help are very real.
The fact that the federal arbitrator hasn't a clue about our world as he claimed and ignored his own side's ridiculously non-existent defense and scientific short-comings is indicative the need to re-invent the fair trial process.
Parents should be wary that they can expect lots of gloating and persecution at least in the near future. We pray for each other. We pray for justice for our children. As Job said, "miserable comforters are ye all".
Jms 5:11 Behold, we count them happy which endure. Ye have heard of the patience of Job, and have seen the end of the Lord; that the Lord is very pitiful, and of tender mercy.
0 comments:
Post a Comment