The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again with the anticipation that each time the results will somehow be different.
What's odd is the fact that Brian Deer claims he has no notion whatsoever that he is inappropriately pressuring due process like a crazed brute beast.
What's even odder is the fact that a couple hundred years later, Americans are witnessing the justice system paid for with drops of patriot blood being methodically de-revolutionized into freedom retracting, neo-colonialism by essentially a single jack-boot agent of the modern European autocracy. Not likely this is one involved man inappropriately influencing things.
Brian Deer made a secondary fatal mistake this time. He mentioned pathology in his belligerent blog boasting.
The average spectator can easily see Deer attacked Wakefield's very important and frankly quite routine work as something unethical and immoral, but he didn't happen to notice anything wrong when International Vaccine Rescue lawyers asked a Cedillo doctor why he didn't collect brain tissue from the child to support his findings.
Believe it or not, tax-payer sponsored U.S. Department of Justice trial lawyers actually wanted to know why brain tissue specimens hadn't been collected from live children, as if they really don't know what happened to these kids.
Now in a broader sense this variety of probing question was raised as a blind attempt to find out if any one actually holds Autistic brain tissue specimens similar to those being withheld by Autism Speaks, the parent company of International Vaccine Rescue run by GE head in hiding "Sponge" Bob Wright.
On the other hand, one toxicologist examined did claim that he had obtained research tissue, but this important fact was permitted to drift off into wonderland. It is unclear whether or not this was due to patented shock and awe fear conjured up International Vaccine Rescue's tax-payer funded defense team.
They certainly insultingly asked the doctor "why not?". One can only conclude the vaccine industrial complex expects causation to rely on drilling a hole into the skulls of living vaccine-injured children then grab brain tissue in order to produce harm's proof.
Deer, is therefore evil in that he seeks the complete destruction of children iatrogenically harmed by routine vaccination. He is, however, quite pathological in his evil, blind pillage of these human lives. Further investigation of the man will undoubtedly reveal Deer is not self-serving, but just happens to like falling on his sword of professionalism repetitively, knowing essentially no one will ever dare challenge this vile creature he's become.
What YOU do when somebody goes on a hell-bent, mincemeat campaign against a bowel disease researcher and the subjects of his work is up to you. Deer's disconcertion now spilling over to vaccine court continues to suggest some sort of media-cloaked perverse social agenda harassment, and certainly the timing of his latest violation of public trust is state-sponsored pathological also.
If one examines why International Vaccine Rescue induces mass panic about Measles or Mumps or Rubella, one finds that, in most cases, these normal childhood diseases are actually benign, making such concerted concern unfounded. This is especially true as first world mortality associated with any common childhood disease infection was in steep decline before the very introduction of a vaccine or a mass vaccination program. The line graphs never reveal much time before the vaccine is introduced.
If one examines the fact that, as traditions go, from the point of introduction forward, the vaccine injected causes more deaths than the disease itself.
This is one of the successful ways of creating the false perception a vaccine actually saves lives. The trick is to prevent the vaccine from entering the market while related mortality rates are still substantial. As the mortality drops off, the window for vaccine introduction opens. Even greater than the liability excuse, this is why the vaccine industry refuses to introduce new vaccines before their time, as Gallo Wines used to say.
If one examines the worst possible chronic outcome of Measles, Mumps, or Rubella infection comparative to the three children represented as test cases one will be forced to accept the vaccine is fully capable and does cause the same outcome.
If it is caused by a vaccine injection some require it be given another name. Some are just now beginning to understand the battle over injury claims is pure semantics.
Vaccination is not a science. While some marvel at things like gene-splicing, it is important to understand often the same individuals involved in creating undetectable agents for germ warfare experimentation switch jobs and work on the vaccine side of biologics.
Contrary to misconception, one is not injecting immunity into the human body with a vaccination. The theory consists of bits and pieces of a virus or a live virus being injected past the mostly effective external human immune system into the depths of the human body, hoping that it will create a desirable immune system response.
In other words, the real virus(es) are well-known to cause in children the same thing as vaccine exposure. These children were exposed to the live virus(es) via vaccine which then caused the same condition or a similar variant of the side effects, illness manifestations present after contagious exposure.
If one examines the fact that the real disease virus either alive in a doctor's waiting room or kept alive, but contained from spreading by being sealed in a vaccine vial is capable of producing the same interchangable viral illness(es)in children, including brain damage, one concludes rightly that adverse neurological outcomes happen.