Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Open Letter To Dan Olmsted

The following open letter was written as a response to Age of Autism editor Dan Olmsted, who recently wrote, The Awful Truth About Autism Speaks.

Dear Dan,

A leech? Come on. How about calling Autism Speaks one of those spaceman black holes? The kind that sucks in entire universes?

I recently transferred browser favorites from one program to another. I culled through all the old URL links just to see which ones are still active (worth keeping).

It's amazing how so many Autism activists suddenly vaporized. They're all gone.

Probably the most obvious was autismfacts.com. The extremely well-produced Thimerosal time line, which has a beginning in the late 1800s, stops like 'The Day The Earth Stood Still' at:

December 11, 2006

* President Bush is presented with the passed Combating Autism Act and it awaits his signature to put the Bill into law.

Take a look at the old Evidence of Harm yahoo list. Now at EOH? All the Autism activists/posters are vaporized. They're all gone.

I was excited, recently, to look at the in-box and once again see that I was part of one of those "undisclosed recipients" E-mails, the kind where fifty Autism parent/activists are sharing their thoughts about the best way to move forward. It was just a computer virus.

The E-mails from fellow parents of vaccine-injured kids have vaporized. They're all gone.

I guess there are two ways to look at this. People are brown-nosers and have a sixth sense for smelling money or Autism Speaks spread like cancer making formerly fearless folks simple little cyber-marxists re-educated into drug company rock-breakers.

Autism Speaks was designed to enable the United States Centers for Disease Control to money launder excessive amounts of tax dollars to CDC anti-litigation bloc Autism researchers.

Autism Speaks chummed millions and millions of dollars looking for the best expert witnesses money could buy to testify against innocent children harmed by vaccines.

Autism Speaks was designed to divide and conquer all opposition to mainstream ideals and encourage lots and lots of covert experimental research by vaccine/drug companies.

Thursday, August 25, 2011

British Medical Journal: Deliberately Obfuscating The Truth

Well? The British Medical Journal is now beginning to admit to their role in the 'shot fired exclusively to be heard by special masters over at vaccine court'.

Thanks to the dogged determination of "not so crazy parents after all" over in England, the editors are slowly revealing they money-laundered payments to Brian Deer from vaccine makers. Just another example of how wired up the media is to screw innocent children harmed by vaccinations the media, once upon a time, helped market in exchange for millions in drug ads.

One commenter made a rather barbed comment in response to an article written by Age of Autism UK editor John Stone.

Someone named media analysis (not to be mistaken for media scholar who would know better to be called media analyst than analysis) asked:

How did the BMJ "clear" the author a freelance journalist to act on it's behalf via 'commission'.[?] Taking into clear account the journalist apparently has no medical or research academic credentials.

Taking such a hard tack isn't exactly well-thought out.

First, the BMJ editors admit they conspired with Brian Deer to plant one on Andrew Wakefield which US Department of Justice trial lawyers and vaccine court special masters then used to throw out Autism test cases.

The corrections popping up at BMJ now provide clear and direct evidence they are just now facing reality. The blow-back against them for their roles as willing partners in the combination of restraint of trade will be monumental.

Secondly, the media analysis person doesn't quite understand science.

For, indeed, anyone can make a scientific observation. However, the fact that Deer found plenty of stuff wrong with the subjects reporting of Wakefield's work, (which isn't exact a crime in the world of science and hardly evidence of fraud)and being a deviant-minded tabloid hacker and wanting to avoid scientific explanation, he fabricated something out of it the same way a tabloid hacker will create UFOs ate my dog stories.

The British Medical Journal shouldn't be confused with the boobs who are abusing it for their other purposes.

For example, a few years ago the British Medical Journal ran the excellent article by Harvard grad student (at the time of publishing), Peter Doshi, which exposed the fraudulent activities of the US Centers For Disease Control and Invention, a place supposedly full of medical doctors, relating to fabricating flatulencing flu statistics.


This iatrogenic fraud was also noted by CBS News during the exact time when the vaccine industry was fully engaged in the second multi-billion dollar fraudulent flu scamdemic within three years.


Back to the BMJ politically-motivated character assassination attempt on Andy Wakefield...

If the stupid conflicts of interests forms were really filled out and on file with the stupid "ethics" web site, why do the boobs over at BMJ and the drug company spy want tight control over who actually views them?

Compare these and note that if you get really fearlessly brave and dare to defy the man by clicking on the icmje pdf link at the British Medical Journal web site you get a blank form:


Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years. HM chairs GMC fitness to practise panels. He had no association with the Wakefield hearings and the views expressed in this article are his own and do not represent those of the GMC.


Competing interests: The author has completed the unified competing interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from him) and declares no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisation that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; BD’s investigation led to the GMC proceedings referred to in this report, including the charges. He made many submissions of information but was not a party or witness in the case, nor involved in its conduct.

The first question is why doesn't the BMJ have Deer's COI form ethically-correct located? You have to ask him? That's not exactly a sound way to provide even the appearances of the avoidance of conflicts of interests. That stupid move proves they are vindictive blood-crazed lynch mobbers ready to attack and destroy whoever doesn't agree with them and certainly not interested in science if it conflicts with their vaccine market buddies.

Tight-fisted control over conflicts of interest material? Come on? It's supposed to be clearly visible at the point of sale. Instead of being up front, the BMJ editors expect the curious invesigator to go to some ridicuolous gator.com-like conflicts of interests forms safe-keeping web site.

Just another change device the new ownership of the British Medical Journal has enacted to keep knowledge out of the hands of scientists and the medical profession.

That's because the media-driven vaccine industry expected to stand behind their products is hiding behind them.

Should "ethics" work in a way to protect those investigating where the allegations of fraud against Andrew Wakefield are actually coming from? Instead of getting the conflicts of interests declarations at the point of sale, the BMJ has devised a nice method of sanistizing inappropriate competitive drug company research interventions and deflecting peer reviewers aside.

A very pretentious trick to fool the reader, oh, by the way, how could Andrew Wakefield have used this form when right-clicking the pdf file reveals it didn't exist until it was created in Sept. of 2009 and interestingly modified in July of 2010. What's even more crude is the fact that the form itself claims an effective date of 2008. What pretense they make.

Monday, August 22, 2011

No Middle Ground For The Media

Well? It seems those too willing to oblige US HHS Secretary Kathleen Silly-bus in her efforts to provide censorship to the savage debauchery taking place presently in 'the House That Merck Built', based primarily on the British Press Spy Award winning tabloid hacker Brian Deer, could use some common sense guidance about how to cover something else up.

It stands to reason those who could not restrain themselves from taking cold hard drug company cheer in exchange for a smear campaign against Andrew Wakefield, a man devoted to unraveling just how vaccines cause Autism precisely (and anybody who dares to speak up about vaccine-induced Autism injury; Don Imus, John McCain, David Kirby, Jenny McCarthy, etc.) have strange hind-sight.

It is insane obvious this is fact. The media has severe problems with addressing powerful individuals with fists full of cash to broker PR deals, much less fight quid ones the ├╝ber boss holding the keys to the front door of these cudzoo media tabloid empires has up his sleeve.

Now that Britain's Parliament is window-dressing British newspaper spy ring habits, complete with the sympathy-raking pie victim trick, we are fortunate enough to now learn some of the facts behind the UK-led media smear campaign of Andrew Wakefield.

In short, Brian Deer spied on everybody. His motives are well spelled out. Through his own words he is exposed as a man who planted one on Andrew Wakefield.

He entered the home of at least one sick kid, providing the unsuspecting mum and dad false credentials. He then drilled them quite mercilessly and relentlessly for up to six hours at a time. Every foggy response was considered a discrepancy. He was wearing a wire without them knowing it. He kept running to the loo. He was communicating with someone. Someone else was secretly recording the mum of an Autistic child.

He kept flipping the same cassette tape over and over to fool the parent into thinking he was alone, but there were others listening, and the poor mother of an Autistic child didn't even have an attorney present.

Brian Deer entrapped them. He used a fake name. Did he also use false statements? Did he lie to her so that he could get his story?

Using false pretense. Preying upon the hospitality of an honest mum seeking to help her poor vaccine-injured child.

None of the Wakefield families would curse the man.

Like Balaam, Deer got angry, threw a hissy fit, and then fabricated a complaint with the UK GMC, something a highway man hired by vaccine manufacturers does to plant one on a good man endeared world-wide by families of Autistic children, victims of vaccine injury.

Brian Deer is a low creature. He is a beast. Though we would that all flesh shall see it, he is the servant of vaccine makers.

And the media is eating a big fat plate of crow.

Surprise, surprise, surprise. The British Medical Journal, which fired the loudest shot parroted around the world, is now in a mess of trouble. BMJ editors claim that it didn't occur to them that they should declare "competing interests" when they publicly accused Wakefield of "Piltdown" science fraud.

Now that the media, which did the dirty dirty deed to the name and reputation of Andrew Wakefield is busy spoon feeding us a steady diet of some gal with a drug giant sized trailing edge, the BMJ has issued a indirectly-linked correction to the BMJ-commissioned Brian Deer pre-fab attack on Andrew Wakefield. It seems BMJ have a little trouble with competing interests. Yes, I have it right. C-O-M-P-E-T-I-N-G interests, and not conflicts of interests.

The British Medical Journal takes millions and millions of dollars in from the monopolizing vaccine manufacturers, one which court records in Australia hold actually distributed a "hit list" of doctors to destroy in place to combat the truth, and editors routinely place drug company favorable studies into medical publication. So while their attempted assassination piece on Andrew Wakefield gained maudlin success in the not-so-perceptive mainstream media, this fact can not be over-looked as it clearly has polluted their credibility.

The British Medical Journal has admitted they are competing against Andrew Wakefield deliberately relating to money. They offered a correction because they are receiving mercenary payments from drug companies.

Why is that? The answer is "that's the media".

What exactly is the media? The media is the entity the general public confuses with the free press.

I decided to figure it out. So I took one of those Latin translator web sites and fed in "media". And guess what? Accordingly the result came back...interventus.

Ordinarily, it's pretty clear this word is an early cousin of intervention and that would mean a third party to separate the two sides and fill in the facts.

In the case of Autism injury relating back to vaccines, the intervention is the vaccine-manufacturing drug companies using black-ops, embedded operatives in government, elected officials, etc. that produce the media such as influenza scamdemic attacks followed by really big butts who are really paid shills.

So from now on when you hear the word media, think ten-in-one Freak Show and not Lou Grant.

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

BREAKING NEWS: MMR Hack Is Paid By Drug Giants

Hey riddle riddle. The cat in the middle. That deer drives by light of the moon. The dirty dog laughed to see such a tort. And our rights disappeared before noon .

We marvel at the fact that reality conflicts with the political will of government vaccine advisers. That research full of evidence is rejected before it is seen declares prejudice.

And who puts these notions inside the heads of IOM committee members? The US Centers For Disease Control? Hardly.

The peculiar pride that walks hand in hand with those who can not possibly admire themselves as they obfuscate, yet privily they knowingly scheme in doing just that, expresses well a higher order. Government is simply a redoubt clever and implacably placed ahead of those walled up in yonder castle.

Whence cometh thou wave after wave after wave of minions on the march to enforce the political will of those who can not allow the public to think independently, to speak publicly, or to experience redemption? Censorship seconds ulterior defiance of good faith, good intentions, and the unpleasant, less than wholesome goodness of three live, neurologically-active viruses let loose inside immature little bodies; a foolish act somehow attested to as dead wrong, yet inexplicably and vociferously defended as necessary.

To those, we suggest your axe belongs to a dying nation, yea rather, the consolidation of a shrinking, elitist empire ignoble and rawly equipped to comprehend that freedom is no excuse to hide behind. Freedom does not deem anything less than compliance to be ignorance. Oppression is uncanny by way of protecting ignorance and unjustly punishing the wise. Freedom reproves ignorance and cherishes the wise. Freedom breaks down the walls of defense, tears through the holy veil, so that all can admire the truth so important to us all.

For it is impossible to not arrive at the contemplation that this wicked game of twists and turns, mutating rules, blind sight, and evil undertaking was hatched not from innocence, but rather in prejudice against the innocents their premeditated offense would create. And to suggest that they take musing the unfortunate victims of their pretentious wheel of misfortune is itself the unraveling diabolical motives.

The delights of these merry men taking pleasure at their injustices are those of they with no solemn distinction for their hollow and meaningless victories in this wicked, treasonous game of theirs.

Ps 10:13 Wherefore doth the wicked contemn God? he hath said in his heart, Thou wilt not require it.

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

The Bad Samaritan's Wild Ride or Things We Don't Get

Maybe you have heard the old saying?

"Three boys at the window, looked out through the bars; two saw dirt and the third saw stars"

Always look on the bright side of life? Always reach for the stars? Always be positive by ignoring your present state of being? (It's always always, ain't it?)

Whatever the moral intended to teach us originally, we always know dirt wins by two-thirds landslide.

"He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future." - George Orwell

There's no lesson to be learned in the fast-acting, yet decade-long Andrew Wakefield massacre except if you find vaccine-strain Measles in the guts and central nervous systems of children, do like the rest, and mind your own business.

Those Measles Wakefield's lab workers found apparently belong to a large vaccine-manufacturing drug company and may not be disseminated. So the secret policeman is sent to enforce the decree from the crown of these modern Medicaleval Times "Measles, Mumps, and Rubella vaccine are, in fact, a very secret Droit du seigneur and not to be thought about intelligently".

It's not supposed to noticed that a little later on billionaire Bill Gates, a vaccine business partner with media mogul Rupert Murdoch, wants vaccines forced on all the little children because he thinks it's a great way to cut population growth by at least 15%.

The relationship between the media and corporate interests has been for long time a shadowy mystery. For years people knew that Reuters Health shared the same CEO as GlaxoSmithKline. Yes, that's messed up, but try to explain why a nation like the UK couldn't find anyone else suitable for one job or the other except Sir Christopher Hogg in both positions at the same time to anybody and well...you dumb-found them with the primary fact that nation is outrageously creepy with conflicts of interests.

Yes it is wrong. No-OK? Come to think of it, how easy it has been for one non-human entity to provoke a stampede to provide financial gratification for the other non-human entity. When you consider the large, very expensive medical hoaxes like the Avian and Swine Flu scamdemics that transpired over the past decade you begin to see the mechanisms for the engineering of consent pose the ultimate danger to civilization. Power is not unreasonable except when corrupt people grasp power for selfish purposes.

Few ever question the honesty and the real intentions of the corporation-media-government relationship without being damaged. This Bermuda-triangle affair as wrong as it and as damaging to human rights as it is fortunately and unfortunately is at toilet-exiting vortex (or apex) right now. These are the best of times. These are the worst of times. These are the dumb-down dumbiest of thimes.

The citizen-spy events in the UK within their elitist socialist system of rule is little more than a disgraceful display of socialist system flaunting by self-flattery. As citizens decry the realization that the UK is essentially a police state they discovered not who polices the policeman, but people are timid and give up too easily.

Many in the UK are fighting the good fight for freedom and for the restoration of good government. They want to know why media mogul Rupert Murdoch's son came from GlaxoSmithKline to a position of authority at Murdoch's Sunday Times also, which then in short time launched a coordinated re-attack on Andrew Wakefield in order to present the low-down, clandestine spy work of corporate henchman Citizen Deer as a noble hero and not as the bad samaritan he really is.

Some in the UK seek to revise history. They claim to have evidence that the nation was once visited the nations of Tarshish by Jesus Christ as a boy. In an effort to justify the Briton's lusts for human sacrifices they are claiming all sorts of things in His name. Rocks, logs, and every chiseled tablet of stone throughout the land is being re-examined to determine if historians failed to recognize something in the past might prove Jesus did once step foot on their land.

But what the rest of Christendom is trying to figure out is what is Jesus Christ telling the people of the United Kingdom today?